Skip to main content

Full text of "Kick It Over 26 (Summer 1991)"

See other formats


Canada USA Australia $3.00 UK 1.50p No. 26 Summer 91 

The revolution will not be a stage play 
it will not be a set-piece 
a theatrical spectacle 

The revolution will not be viewed from $30 cushioned seats 
in the balcony 
in air-conditioned comfort 
The revolution will not be singing and dancing 

and bright-coloured period costumes 
The revolution will not be greeted with cheers and applause 
by men in business suits or tuxedos 
and women and furs and evening gowns 
There will be no standing ovation at the end of the revolu 
as the audience exits the theater 
discussing the drama, the pathos, the stagih 
The revolution will not be a stage play 

The revolution will be our lives 
it will be our deaths 
The revolution will be in the streets 
and in our homes 

The revolution will be what we do and who we 
not what we say 
or what we wear 

The men in suits and women in furs will not 


they will fight it 
and we will fight them 
The revolution will not have an ending 
The revolution is our lives. 



1 mf 



I 



WE'RE BACK, FOLKS! 


This is the first issue of KIO to be printed 
since December, 1989. After doing the magazine 
for eight years, the previous editorial board burned 
out and decided to discontinue. However, a new 
board was formed by devotees who didn't want to 
see the magazine die. One of us was involved in 
producing the most recent issue, the others have no 
previous involvement in production. 

We regret the delay, and our inability to an- 
swer the many letters that came in asking what had 
happened to us or why their subscriptions hadn't 
been honoured. We've been too busy learning the 
intricacies of desktop publishing and sifting through 
the accumulation of submissions. Thanks for your 
patience. 

The new editors are committed to publishing 
quarterly (should we fail, subscriptions will be ex- 
tended to cover the number of issues paid for.) 
Since over half the money received from sales in 
stores goes to our distributors, we encourage our 
readers to subscribe directly. 


What We Believe 

The Kick It Over collective is opposed to all 
forms of hierarchy and domination, whether right 
or left. 

For us, revolution is more a process than an 
event - a process rooted in the radicalization of in- 
dividuals and in the transformation of everyday life. 

Rather than make a principle out of violence 
or nonviolence, we believe in judging actions on 
their own merits. 

We support acts of challenge and resistence to 
authority, and we encourage all efforts to develop 
models for a new way of living. 

We are not a mouthpiece for an "official" 
anarchist movement. We prefer to go beyond the 
stock issues which make up the "left agenda." 

Since we are interested in the creation of a 
politics of everyday life, we attempt to draw out 
and popularize those implicitly radical values and 
lifestyles which we believe are pointing in the 
direction of freedom. 

We do not identify with the "official left," 
which seeks to establish itself as a new ruling 
group. We identify with, and seek to give voice to, 


the largely unarticulated anti-authoritarian tenden- 
cies within society. 

We are committed to spontaneity, by which 
we mean the triumph of life over dogma. Hence, 
we believe that freedom is in need of constant re- 
definition. 


Prisoner Subscriptions 

It was once our policy to give prison inmates 
free subscriptions on request, but we've had so 
many requests that this is now beyond our financial 
resources. We do, however, still send one compli- 
mentary issue to prisoners who so request. One 
magazine that is sent free to prisoners, and deals 
directly with their concerns, is Prison News 
Service, POB 5052 Stn A, Toronto M5W 1W4. It's 
published by Bulldozer, and includes the U.S. 
publication Marionette News. 


Looking For New Editors 

The collective needs more members in order 
to achieve its goals. If you live in the Toronto area, 
share the above-mentioned principles and would 
like to consider joining, please contact us. We’d 
also like to hear from people in other areas who 
would be interested in promoting Kick It Over in 
their area, 
for Kick It Over 
Alison Curtis, Maria Lester, 

Bob Melcombe, Gary Moffatt 

the editors wish to thank Karl Amdur, of the 
previous collective, for his time and patience in 
teaching us the intricacies of desktop publishing. 

Subscribe to Kick It Over: 

$9 (Canadian) for four issues 
U.S.-S9 U.S. 
overseas-the equivalent 

All submissions and subscriptions to: 

Kick It Over, 

PO Box 5811, Stn A, 

Toronto, Ontario 
Canada M5W 1P2. 


SUMMER 1991 page 2 


Table of Contents 


We're Back, Folks! 2 

Guidelines For Contributors 4 

From Neo Colonialism to New World Order 5 

Paths to Social Change 9 

From Buying Co-op To Political Action 16 

A Woman Alone With Her Self 18 

Living the spirit 

On Growing Up Indian 22 

Surviving Child Abuse 25 

Looking to Our Roots 26 

Journeys Through Central America 28 

Slidebank For Social Activists 36 

Smashing the Iron Ricepot 37 

The Global Village 39 

In Brief 

Letters To The Editor 46 


Cover poem by Bob Melcombe was inspired by Gil Scot-Heron, The Revolution Will Not Be Televised. 


Guidelines For Contributors 


We need your articles and letters. Only 
through a constant exchange of news and ideas 
among its readers can Kick It Over achieve its 
goals. 

Articles should be between 150 and 2500 
words, though we'll print longer ones if the mate- 
rial so warrants. Very long articles may be printed 
over two issues. 

Submissions intended for one of our regular 
features (i.e. letters to the editor, paths to social 
change) should be so indicated. 

Payment: Fame and Glory. Five copies of the 
issue in which you appear. 

Simultaneous Submissions: Please let us know 
to what other publications your submission has 
been sent. If there is significant overlap, we will 
not print. 

We occasionally (not all that often) print po- 
etry and fiction, provided it deals with the themes 
of the magazine. 

We always need good graphics, so art submis- 
sions are welcome. We suggest that you not send 
originals without a written request for them. 

Our primary concerns are anti-authoritarian- 
ism, feminism, radical ecology and methods of so- 
cial change. We sometimes print articles in related 
areas. 

While we are committed to good writing, we 
wish to encourage new or less-skilled writers to 
contribute. Not everyone who has good ideas can 
write well. Our primary committment is to ideas. 

We reserve the right to edit for style, length, 
grammar and offensive language. When editing, we 
will do our best to maintain the integrity of the 
ideas. 

We prefer submissions to be typed, double- 
spaced. IBM compatible disks are fine if you hap- 
pen to have access. 

We return material if a stamped, self-ad- 
dressed envelope is enclosed. (If you live outside 
Canada, please do not use stamps; instead, remit 
cash equal to the cost of mailing it to us.) 

The following guidelines and preferences are 
not commandments engraved in stone. If the article 
has something worthwhile to say, we will consider 
printing it: 


-we encourage contributors to avoid sexist lan- 
guage and attitudes. We prefer "s/he" or other gen- 
der-neutral terms to the generic "he." 

-likewise, we discourage writing that discrimi- 
nates according to youth/age, sexual preference, 
class, education or ability. 

-we do not print racist writing. 

-please try to avoid rhetoric and jargon. 

-we dislike gratuitous personal attacks; it is 
not necessary to impugn a person's character to 
criticize her/his ideas. 



Kick It Over 


April 1991 


edited and published by the Kick It Over 
Collective. All correspondence to Kick 
It Over PO Box 5811, Station A, 
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5W 1P2. 

Subscriptions: Canada ($9.00/4 issues), 
USA ($9.00 /4 issues-U.S. currency), 
Australia (9.00/6 issues Australian cash 
only), UK (4 pounds/4 issues personal 
checks ok, no postal money orders.) 

Published four times a year. 2nd class 
registration #5907. ISSN 0823-6526. In- 
dexed in the Alternative Press Index. 


From Neo Colonialism to New World Order 


By Gary Moffatt 


1. The Latest Massacre 

The "Gulf War" wasn't really a war at all. 
When almost thirty industrial nations drop thou- 
sands of bombs on a third world country each night 
for six consecutive weeks, the total tonnage used 
being many times that which obliterated Nagasaki 
in 1945, we are speaking not of a War but of a 
Massacre, one of the first to be initiated by the New 
World Order. Why did the peace movement fail so 
drastically to mobilize public opinion against the 
war that 91% of the American populace, and vast 
majorities of the populations of the other countries 
that took part, approved of what had been done at 
the close of hostilities? (assuming, of course, that 
the pollsters aren't lying to us.) 

This article will argue that much of the answer 
lies in the consistent failure of the North American 
peace movement to analyze the nature and goals of 
the war machine created by the USA and its satel- 
lites, currently acting to preserve a "new world or- 
der. " Until quite recently, the peace movement has 
preferred to espouse single-issue causes, -- i.e. "no 
nuclear arms for Canada" or "refuse the Cruise" in 
Canada, a nuclear freeze in the USA -- without ask- 
ing itself or anyone else whether the corporate rul- 
ing elite can grant such demands within the context 
of the colonialist role it has elected to play. More 
recently, marches have attempted to link two or 
three single issues, still with no basic analysis about 
why so many things are wrong at the same time. 

Thus, peace movement supporters at the outset 
of the Massacre expressed dismay that the "peace 
dividend" which had seemed within their grasp a 
year earlier had been yanked away. Nobody who 
understands what the industrial nations are doing to 
the third world thought that peace was at hand a 
year ago. 

Although the collapse of Russia's empire ter- 
minated the cold war pretext which had fanned mil- 
itarism since 1945, the USA still has lots of pre- 
texts left. Chief among these is the myth that eco- 
nomic security requires a continually expanding 
economy, which requires unlimited access to the 
third world's natural resources and cheap labour, as 
well as shunting ecological concerns to the back 


burner. This access has always been the cornerstone 
of U.S. foreign policy, and therefore of the other 
industrial countries that now accept U.S. leader- 
ship. 

The only change is that these industrial coun- 
tries, including perhaps Russia, are now acting in 
unison instead of competing against one another. 
This is not because of any sudden attainment of en- 
lightenment, but because such cooperation serves 
the needs of the corporations, which controlled the 
U.S. government since 1865. Since WW2 these 
corporations have become multinational in scope, 
and the governments they control are expected to 
follow suit. Let anyone who challenges the claim 
that corporations control these governments try to 
get elected without corporate funds. 

The megacorporations and their satellite gov- 
ernments are establishing a global political system 
known as the "new world order." Like the isms, 
this term means different things to different people; 
in this article it means domination of the world by 
USA, Japan and the European Economic Commu- 
nity (more precisely, by the multinational corpora- 
tions which control their political systems) through 
a combination of economic coercion and military 
intervention. To understand the Gulf Massacre and 
other current events, we must understand how this 
system evolved. 


2. The Neo Colonial Era 

Although the USA is commonly credited with 
having freed its slaves in 1865, what in fact hap- 
pened was a slight modification in U.S. methods of 
administering slavery, which reflected the tilt in 
power from the agricultural south to the industrial 
north -- a tilt which the American Civil War made 
official. Instead of bringing the slaves to North 
America to work on plantations, the USA after 
1865 left them in their native countries and im- 
ported the stuff they produced instead. This created 
less mess within U.S. boundaries, and paved the 
way for enslavement of peoples of brown and yel- 
low skin as well as black. 

To make sure that they remained slaves, i.e. 
forced labour with no control over their working 
conditions, the Americans and Europeans divided 
South America, Asia and Africa into separate politi- 


SUMMER 1991 page 5 


cal units known as countries, which were then di- 
vided among the industrial powers.. After WW1, 
similar arbitrary divisions were made in the Middle 
East and Eastern Europe. The divisions completely 
disregarded ethnic and bioregional considerations, 
leading (since WW2 in Africa, currrently in the 
Middle East and Yugoslavia) to tragic struggles for 
control by disparate groups after the countries' 
liberation from their colonial rulers. 

.While Europe ruled its conquered countries 
directly, the USA preferred a policy of "neo 
colonialism" through which it installed corrupt na- 
tive rulers who were willing to exploit workers and 
peasants on behalf of the corporations, so long as 
their small ruling elites were allowed to live com- 
fortably. These elites were backed by U.S. -trained 
armies or, where these proved insufficient, by di- 
rect U.S. intervention. (See the long country-by- 
country list of U.S. interference in other countries 
which I prepared for KIO #16). U.S. corporations 
knew that they could attain world hegemony with- 
out permanent occupation of U.S. colonies if, as 
Andrew Carnegie said in 1898, the USA "turns 
from phantom schemes of annexation of barbarous 
peoples in distant lands and just looks down to her 
feet and sees the world." 

When the European colonial empires were de- 
stroyed by the first two world wars of our century, 
the USA undertook to control the entire world in 
this manner. WW3 began on March 12, 1947, 
when President Truman proclaimed his doctrine 
that the USA has the right to intervene anywhere in 
the world, and immediately invoked this principle 
to help suppress popular movements in Greece and 
Turkey. WW3 is not a war between nations, but 
between the rich and the poor, with the middle 
classes generally supporting the rich so long as its 
own economic comfort is provided. The battle the- 
atres of WW3 shift from year to year, to wherever 
people are trying to liberate themselves so that they 
can feed their families-the deserts of Iraq, the 
forests of Mozambique, the streets of Detroit, the 
Oka Reserve and so forth. 


3. The New Order Cometh 

By the 1970s, U.S. corporations had gone 
worldwide and, instead of relying solely on the 
U.S. government as the means of exploitation, they 
evolved the trilateralist doctrine that the USA, 
Japan and Western Europe would dictate to the rest 
of the world by controlling international finance 
and foreign aid. This process was later facilitated 


by the collapse of the Soviet empire and by Russia's 
growing identification with the other industrialized 
nations. 

Since Reagan's election in 1980, the USA has 
consistently reneged on its financial obligations to 
the United Nations, preferring instead to dole out 
foreign aid through its own U.S. AID program. 
This way it can set its own conditions on foreign 
aid, usually insisting that the aid go to help the 
better-off farmers and consequently drive the 
poorer ones off the land. This makes it easy to 
transfer the land from producing subsistence crops 
for the population to producing luxury crops for 
export to the west. 

After sponsoring a military coup in Thailand 
in 1976, for instance, the USA presided over the 
deprivation of 30% of the peasants of their land, 
thereby creating the phenomenon of the landless 
peasant previously unknown in Thailand. It also in- 
sisted that co-ops be regrouped along regional 
rather than village lines, to kill any grassroots 
strength. There was another military coup in Thai- 



page 6 KICK IT OVER #26 


land while world attention was diverted to the Gulf, 
also quite likely masterminded by the CIA although 
the evidence has yet to appear. Both coups were in 
response to growing tendencies of the civilian gov- 
ernments to distance themselves from U..S. policies. 
Since the second coup, residents of the Pa Kham 
District of Buri Ram Province have been threatened 
with arrest and eviction because of their resistance 
to illegal logging and to eucalyptus growers, while 
elsewhere in Thailand healthy debate over large ir- 
rigation dams, salt mining, plantation projects and 
community land rights has been stifled. 

While consistently undermining the United 
Nations, the USA has also used its influence there 
to force the U.N. to follow a corporate agenda, and 
made it a party to such deeds of U.S. imperialism 
as the Korean War and the murder of Patrice Lu- 
mumba in Zaire. Under U.S. pressure, a resolution 
calling for a Palestinian homeland is ignored at the 
U.N,. while one calling for Iraqi withdrawal from 
Kuwait is enforced by a massacre. By allowing it- 
self to be used in this manner, the U.N. has gravely 
weakened its credibility and jeapordized its future. 

One of the cornerstones of U.S. (or New 
World Order) policies is to maintain the arbitrary 
political boundaries which were drawn up in the 
third world by the colonial empires in the 19th 
century and after WW1, which are guaranteed to 
keep each country too physically weak and/or beset 
by contentions of divergent ethnic groups to act ef- 
fectively against domination by the industrial states. 
When Saddam Hussein showed signs of disputing 
this domination, Iraq had to be further weakened. 
To this end, the Americans led Hussein to believe 
that they would not oppose his annexation of 
Kuwait; after the deed was done, they proceeded to 
demand his withdrawal under conditions so humili- 
ating that no one of his temperament was likely to 
agree. 

The USA consistently refused to negotiate its 
demands to allow Saddam to save face, thereby 
making war inevitable, and at the same time misled 
Saddam about his ability to resist an invasion in or- 
der to encourage him to fight. During the war, the 
USA increased its demands each time Saddam at- 
tempted to meet them; he was only allowed to sur- 
render after the USA had finished testing its 
weapons of mass destruction and making Iraq an 
object lesson against future third world resistance. 

U.S. policy dictates that the borders of Iraq, 
as well as Kuwait, remain intact. While proclaiming 
that it wanted Saddam Hussein to go, the USA in 
practice protected him. His removal might have led 
to loss of territory by Iraq, to corresponding in- 


creases in power of other states in the region, and 
to Kurdish independence providing a beacon of 
hope to oppressed fourth world (stateless) peoples 
whom the USA is determined to keep oppressing. 
The massacres of the Kurds in the north and of 
Shiite Moslems in the south which followed Hus- 
sein's surrender to the USA was a collaborative ef- 
fort of Bush and Hussein; Bush had continued sup- 
plying Hussein with arms (via Jordan) right up to 
the point at which he began to massacre Hussein's 
people, and after the massacre Bush delayed im- 
plementing demands that Hussein surrender his ar- 
senal until Hussein had time to complete the 
slaughter of the Kurds and Shiites. Bush did noth- 
ing to help the Kurds until France and Britain began 
talking about establishing "enclaves" for them; 
since enclaves might have formed the basis of a fu- 
ture homeland. Bush scotched the idea by estab- 
lishing "refugee camps" instead. 

While third world repression remains one of 
the trilateral alliance's primary goals, another is to 
force down production costs at home by depriving 
labour of the gains it has made during the late 19th 
and early 20th century. Although the value of Key- 
nesian economics has yet to be refuted, the indus- 
trial states are presently reducing both the number 
of jobs and the amount of social security available 
on the pretext of reducing national debt. Industrial 
nations are forcing their workers to compete with 
those of the third world for their jobs. The USA is 
forcing "free trade" down the throats of Canada and 
Mexico, although both countries' populaces voted 
against it. (56% of Canadians were unable to defeat 
"free trade" because their votes against it were di- 
vided between two opposition parties, while the 
Mexican ruling party simply ignored its defeat at 
the polls). At the same time, small independent 
farmers are being forced off the land in both indus- 
trialized and third world nations. 

Any third world government that resists cut- 
ting its peoples' living standards is promptly de- 
prived of credit by the International Monetary Fund 
and the World Bank; if this doesn't force it into 
line, the USA sponsors either a military coup (ie 
Chile, Thailand), a prolonged war with rightwing 
guerrillas (ie Mozambique, Nicaragua) or outright 
invasion (ie Guatemala, Grenada.) A current 
drought in Ethiopia and Sudan is the result of the 
destruction of the South American rain forest, 
which has been caused by the military junta which 
the USA installed in Brazil in 1964 stealing peas- 
ants' land and forcing them to cut down trees in the 
Amazon. 


SUMMER 1991 page 7 


F 


Such tactics aren’t 
unknown to force industrial 
nations into line, either. In 
the mid 1970s, the USA 
prevailed upon the 
Australian governor general 
to dismiss a government 
which threatened one of its 
bases there. Last year 
Ontario, Canada's largest 
province, elected a social 
democratic government 
whose first budget 

maintained a certain degree 
of social spending (enough to 
reduce, but not eliminate, 
hunger in the province,) at 
the cost of increasing 
Ontario's deficit. Financiers 
promptly reduced Ontario's 
credit rating and threatened 
to withdraw various 

industries from the province. 

It remains to be seen how far 
the new world order will go 
to force Ontario into monetarism, and at what point 
the Ontario government will capitulate (its social 
democratic counterpart in France, under Francois 
Mitterand, held out for two years before 
dismantling the social reforms it had instituted.) 
Whether Ontario does capitulate or not might settle 
the ongoing anarchist debate about whether to vote 
for social democrats or boycott elections. 


What Is To Be Done? 

Faced with inevitable declines in world living 
standards if the environment is to be kept from 
collapsing, the political right has established an 
agenda which will enable the top 20% of income 
earners to continue living in luxury while the rest 
of us fight each other for their garbage. Since 1980 
the right has had everything its own way, largely 
because the left has no agenda of its own and has 
confined itself to protesting, and very occasionally 
resisting, rightwing measures. For the situation to 
change, the populace must not only become disen- 
chanted with the New World Order whose mas- 
sacres it now so enjoys; it must create the means of 
freeing itself from a political system in which they 
are only allowed to choose between right wing par- 
ties. To date, there is little indication that the peo- 


ple will have 
either the will 
or the 

resourcefulness 
to break this 
rightwing 
monopoly on 
power. 

Since most 
people are too 
busy making 
money and 
watching 
television to 
concern 

themselves with 
social change, 
the only hope I 
can see is for 
the small 

minority who 
do see the need 
for a different 
social order to 
proceed to 
create it, and hope that others will join when they 
come to see that capitalism won't meet their needs. 
Politically, we must resist all forms of exploitation; 
racist, sexist, ageist, homophobic, cultural and so 
forth. Culturally, we have come a long way since 
the 60s in creating a spontaneous popular culture in 
opposition to the one we are fed by the mass media. 
However, we still have a long way to go so long as 
people would rather flock to expensive superstar 
events than attend homegrown cultural happenings 
in parks, community centres or church basements. 

Less progress has been made economically. 
We cannot free the third world from exploitation 
and war unless we at the same time free ourselves 
from dependence on corporate capitalism. Creating 
an alternative economy which can provide more ba- 
sic security than do the corporations can be done, 
but it's a long job and counter cultures in most 
western countries have barely begun. Whether we 
choose as our model the networks of worker and 
consumer co-operatives of the Basque regions of 
Spain (notably Mondragon), the networks of small 
but democratically run firms or "artisan villages" in 
northcentral Italy (notably Modena), or some other 
model of our own designing, we must demonstrate 
that we don't need the corporations in order to sur- 
vive. 

Returning to the question of the peace move- 
ment's failure in the Gulf cited at the outset of this 



page 8 KICK IT OVER #26 


article, it may well be that there is no longer a place 
for the peace movement that rose as a result of the 
cold war tensions of the 1950s. This movement was 
based on the affluent middle class fearing for its 
families' safety in the event of accidental or 
preemptive nuclear war. While still very real, this 
danger now comes mainly from friction between the 
have and have-not nations, rather than between the 
superpowers of whom only one remains. The 
'terrorist" or "freedom fighter" (depending on your 
viewpoint) wings of several exploited countries 
have, or will soon have, either nuclear weapons or 
"smart" conventional ones capable of doing an 
equal amount of damage. They won't have as many 
weapons as do the industrial powers, but they'll 
have less to lose by using the ones they do have. 

Under these circumstances, there seems no 


further point in opposing the proliferation of nu- 
clear weapons without linking this to the question 
of the uses to which they will be put. The cause of 
peace is now so closely linked to the battle against 
third world exploitation that the usefulness of a 
separate peace movement is hard to see. We do 
need a faction within the anti-imperialist movement 
that will press for non-violent methods of resistance 
wherever possible, but the peace movement has 
never held a consensus on nonviolence so this role 
would be beyond its scope. Folding the peace 
movement would liberate the energies of its mem- 
bership to join existing anti-imperialist groups, to 
create new ones if they don't find any they like, or 
in some cases to convert existing peace groups to 
anti-imperialist ones. 


Paths to Social Change 

what works ? what doesn 't? share your experiences in this ongoing feature 


Most anarchists would like to live in some sort 
of federated tribal society, where the basic social 
units are small enough for each person to have an 
input into the decision-making process, and matters 
of common concern would be worked out by repre- 
sentatives of each tribe. None of us knows how 
we ’re going to get from here to there, though some 
have an idea what route they wish to travel on. An- 
archists spend a great deal of time debating the rel- 
ative merits of confronting the System vs. building 
our own society from the bottom up, violent vs. 
nonviolent confrontation, voting vs. boycotting 
elections and similar topics. 

The purpose of this regular feature in KIO will 
be, not to take sides in any of these disputes, but 
rather to trace the progress of adherents of each 
position in working for social change. Both 
confrontation and building alternatives require a 
much wider arsenal of methods and tactics than is 
currently being employed, an arsenal which will 
build both on the lessons of experience and the 
powers of imagination. Perhaps the tactics used 
and lessons learned in one area can be of use to 
people in other areas working on similar problems. 

So that we can share our experiences, KIO re- 
quests from our readers in various parts of the 


world reports on what they've done, what's worked 
and what hasn't, lessons learned etc. We'll take a 
number of these reports out of the publications KIO 
receives in exchange, but we'd also like to print 
original material from people writing us on either a 
regular or an occasional basis. The reports can be 
anywhere from a few sentences to a page or more in 
length, depending on how important you see the 
project you 're reporting on as being. 


Community Front Aids Strikers 

EUGENE OREGON: After beginning a 28-month 
strike against Morgan Products Ltd., a leading 
manufacturer of fir doors in Oregon, workers dis- 
covered that Morgan was winning the PR campaign 
due to its ability to hire professional media experts. 
Laws that prohibit secondary boycotts, sympathy 
strikes and more than a limited number of picketers 
severely restrict a union's effectiveness in a labour 
dispute. To reverse this, supporters of the union in 
the community formed an independent community 
group whose skills were used to produce radio ads 
about the strike, organize fundraising events and 
turn out monthly community pickets. Most impor- 


SUMMER1991 page 9 






page 10 KICK IT OVER #26 






tantly, the group explained to the community how 
the company was taking income from the commu- 
nity by replacing union workers with scabs, and 
demanding concessions which would take an extra 
$1.5 million from the local economy. When the 
company brought court action against the activists 
as "agents" of the union, the union won the court 
case. 

After 28 months, the company won the strike 
by decertifying the union in a vote from which the 
striking workers were barred. However, a perma- 
nent community organization has been created to 
support labour struggles, and is later supported the 
striking Greyhound bus drivers, helping them to get 
the kind of press coverage that underlines the com- 
munity issues of the Greyhound strike. The or- 
ganization also works to stop log exports, reduce 
work weeks and obtain loan and tax incentives for 
workers to buy mills and set up new co-operatives 
and businesses. Besides better working conditions, 
the organization presses for requirements that buy- 
ers seeking to acquire major production facilities is- 
sue social impact statements. This would discour- 
age debt-ridden companies from purchasing such 
facilities and retiring their debt at the expense of 
Oregon's communities. 

Unions have funds needed for community or- 
ganizing, and can confront industrial elites by shut- 
ting down production. Community groups are 
sometimes not subject to the same prohibitions 
(such as from picketing executives' homes) from 
which unions suffer, and widespread community 
support can make it difficult for a company to hire 
scabs. Although lost, the Morgan strike showed the 
possibilities inherent in union-community co-opera- 
tion. 

Portland Alliance, December 1990. 

2807 S.E. Stark, 

Portland, OR, 

USA 97214. 


Contest Encourages Thought 

TORONTO ONTARIO: The Toronto Recycling Ac- 
tion Committee, one of a number appointed by mu- 
nicipal government but acting with a fair degree of 
independence, recently held a "What Products 
Make You Scream?" contest to encourage people to 
think about environmentally harmful products. The 
235 entries were mostly concerned about over- 
packaging, disposal products such as diapers, and 
products with harmful chemicals. The winner, who 
identified junk mail, processed food packaging and 


styrofoam peanuts, received as a prize environ- 
mentally friendly personalized stationery printed on 
recycled paper. 

Another innovation being considered in 
Toronto is a proposal by the city's Planning and 
Development Department that a permanent advisory 
group of young people be established at City Hall, 
modelled after similar groups in Edmonton and 
Seattle, to advise City Council on matters that affect 
and interest young people such as improvements to 
parks, community facilities and public transit, re- 
ducing gang violence and combatting pollution. 

City Press Releases, 22-11-90, 19-3-91. 


Monitor Local Events 

GABRIOLA, B.C.: New Catalyst, the B.C. environ- 
mentalist tabloid, suggests that those concerned 
about forestry issues should form "watershed 
groups" in their own areas. Such groups can make 
themselves familiar with their local forest — plant 
and animal types, water sources and soils etc. -- 
and make systematic observations of forest condi- 
tions, so that they will have the required knowledge 
to participate in forest planning. The suggestions 
are geared to B.C., where the Ministry of Forests 
offer a number of public processes enabling citizens 
to engage in planning discussions, but groups in 
other areas can find out whether similar programs 
exist in their province or state and demand them if 
they don't. (New Catalyst, POE Box 189, Gabriola 
BC VOR 1X0, subs $19.) One of the proposed 
strategies, starting community land trusts to remove 
property from the speculative market and permit 
long-term planning for its preservation and use, is 
borrowed from U.S. groups such as the Schu- 
macher Society, which have been doing this for 
years. For information on starting land trusts: 

Turtle Island Earth Stewards, 5810 Battison St., 
#101, Vancouver BC V5R 5X8. 


Community Development 

ANNAPOLIS VALLEY. N.S.: One possible way for 
residents of an area to encourage local control of 
their own economy is for them to start a commu- 
nity-based development company to help create 
lasting jobs that will benefit the community. The 
growth of one such company, Annapolis Ventures, 
is charted in an article in Perception v.13 #4. A 
two-day seminar involving county business and 
community leaders of this rural Nova Scotia area 


SUMMER 1991 page 11 


produced a list of 200 ideas for job creation and 
business development. After studies determined 
which of these were the most realistic; Annapolis 
Ventures was formed to carry out an action plan 
based on these studies for the encouragement of 
small business. A consulting staff helps people de- 
termine which business proposals seem viable, and 
sometimes invests money through loans or share 
purchases. The company has helped create several 
hundred jobs and give small businesses the data 
they need to survive. Although originally govern- 
ment-funded, the company planned to continue 
independently at the end of its original five-year 
contract. 

Perception 

55 Parkdale, box 3585, Stn C, 

Ottawa Canada K1Y 4GI 

Abandon Power Plant 

TURKEY: Although not known for its responsive- 
ness to public opinion, the Turkish government has 
abandoned a billion dollar thermal power plant on 
the Aegean coast (which was to have been built in a 
forested area by a Japanese consortium) after 
50,000 protesters formed a 24 km human chain to 
dramatize their opposition. 

Nimbin News, #2495 
POE Box 209, 

Nimbin, Australia 2480 

Wind Energy Co-ops 

DENMARK: Citizens are joining wind energy co- 
operatives, and this year the country hopes to ob- 
tain 2 % of its electric power from "wind parks" run 
by the utility companies and by citizen-owned wind 
power co-operatives. Co-ops are easy to start, 
range in size from 100-200 people, and in most 
cases own just one windmill, which produces 
enough power for 50-100 households and reduces 
by 1.1 million pounds the amount of carbon dioxide 
that would be emitted by a coal-fired plant filling 
the same purpose. 

Earth Island Journal, 

300 Broadway #28, 

San Francisco, CA 
USA 94133. 

Autonomy Group Forms 

POLAND: Here is the declaration on the formation 
of the independent political group Autonomia, from 
a Budapest press release: 


Autonomy in our interpretation is 
not only the final social aim, but also the 
free, responsible, morally guided be- 
haviour of self-conscious people. 



The aim is a society without rulers, 
without hierarchy, without authoritari- 
anism; a society based on autonomy, 
self-governing communities functioning 
in a decentralized federation. Mutual aid, 
nonviolence, tolerance and rejection of 
hierarchy should be the principles of the 
self-organizing society. All economic 
entities (factories, companies etc.) should 
be the common property of those work- 
ing there, and all these should be run ac- 
cording to the principles of workers' self 
government. Economy should be sub- 
mitted to humanitarian and ecological 
goals. 

Direct democracy should work in 
policy. The groups of people or com- 
munities should form their councils 
working on the principles of direct 
democracy and imperative mandate; that 
is, the members should only represent 
the decisions made by the voters. 

No more oppression, no more ex- 
ploitation! 


page 12 KICK IT OVER #26 


No more discrimination for po- 
litical, national, racist, religious, sexual 
or any other reasons! 

No more patriarchal men's rule! All 
women, children and elderly people 
should enjoy total emancipation. 

AUTONOMIA is an independent 
Hungarian political group without any 
leadership, which will not work either as 
an association or as a political or- 
ganization (i.e. a party.) The group will 
not join the struggle for political power, 
but will support the other independent 
grassroot communities, movements and 
groups, and will help them become active 
in the political situation. The group will 
not have its representatives, but will be 
active politically in a direct way by 
spreading its ideas and creating new al- 
ternatives ways of life. Though the final 
aim is the society without parties and 
state, in the political situation in Hungary 
we support all independent initiatives 
which want to break the power of this 
totalitarian one-party system and fight for 
pluralism. 

None of the existing models of 
democracy in the world are attractive 
enough for us, we reject all state-power 
systems. 

Everyone who agrees with our prin- 
ciples is welcome to our groups. 

from press release 

Nuclear Resisters Turn To Gulf 

USA: Civil disobedience arrests of anti-nuclear ac- 
tivists dropped off sharply during the last four and 
one-half months of 1990, as many advocates of 
nonviolent direct action turned their attention in late 
summer to the impending Persian Gulf War. Ac- 
cording to statistics compiled by the Nuclear Re- 
sister newsletter, of the 3,000 anti-nuclear attests 
reported during the year, less than 10% occurred 
after Nagasaki Day, August 9. In 1989, 5,530 such 
arrests were reported. 57% of the arrests occurred 
at the Nevada nuclear weapons test site, where ac- 
tions continued into 1991. While most test site ar- 
rests were not prosecuted, five people served up to 
seven months in federal prisons or half-way houses 
in 1990 for test site arrests from the previous year. 

Following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and the 
U.S.-led military response, activists across the 
continent turned skills and determination, honed 


during more than a decade of anti-nuclear direct 
action, to the task of trying to prevent the Gulf 
War. 

Two civil disobedience campaigns claimed at 
least partial victories. Repeated blocking of Cana- 
dian Air Force Base runways by the Innu people of 
Labrador may have been a factor in NATO's deci- 
sion not to locate a new weapons centre there, al- 
though overhead flights and prosecution of native 
hunters continues. In upstate New York, Governor 
Cuomo ordered reconsideration of plans to create a 
low-level radioactive waste dump after a melee be- 
tween state troopers and local citizens who stood 
behind six Allegheny county elders who had hand- 
cuffed themselves across a bridge. 

In the harshest prison sentence of the year, 
Jennifer Haines was sentenced to a maximum two 
years in federal prison, simply for praying inside 
the gate of the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant 
near Denver. Due to her absolute non-cooperation 
with the legal system, Haines was convicted not 
only of trespass but on a bogus charge of failing to 
appear. 

Nuclear Resister, PO Box 43383 
Tucson, AZ 
USA 85733. 

10 issues: $18 U.S., $21 Canada, $28 overseas. 

Social Movements and Minorities. 

BROOKLYN: I would like to describe some of the 
history of the NYC Brooklyn Anti-Nuclear Group 
(BANG,) now defunct, to show how third world 
and minority people can be put off by largely white 
social change movements. BANG defined itself in 
two ways: we were anti-nuclear (both power and 
weapons)) and we were also anti-racist. 

Along with simple moral concern, we de- 
scribed ourselves as anti-racist for very concrete 
reasons. The anti-nuclear cause intersected with 
working-class/anti-racist issues in many ways. Ev- 
ery dollar that goes for bombs further impoverishes 
the already destitute, who are disproportionately 
non-white. The boycott of South Africa, and fight 
against apartheid, included stopping uranium ex- 
ports to the west that had been mined in South 
Africa and its Namibian colony. The struggle for 
American Indian sovereignty is also a struggle 
against uranium mining on their lands -- utilities are 
not just the enemy because they run nuclear power 
plants, but because the poor have the hardest time 
paying bills, facing shutoffs etc. It’s third-world 
countries that have been threatened with planned H- 


SUMMER 1991 page 13 


bombings. Blacks had a harder time fleeing Three 
Mile Island because of a lack of means. 

But, more generally and importantly, we saw 
a contradiction between the way nuclear 
power/weapons would affect all people -- as op- 
posed to an anti-nuclear movement that was clearly 
white, and not made up of all people. There is 
something profoundly racist about this, whether or 
not conscious and intentional. Poverty stricken vic- 
tims of racism are going to be going about the busi- 
ness of day-to-day living and survival, before 
they'll get into such seemingly esoteric issues like 
"nukes." 

The other main problem is whites' attitudes, 
and how they may turn off third-worlders. While 
I've never encountered any 
out-and-out racism among 
white anti- 

nuclear/environmental etc. 
activists, there's plenty of 
"objective racism.” There's a 
provincial and chauvinistic 
"What does racism have to 
do with us and our issue" 
attitude, when there's an 
attitude about lack of third- 
world involvement at all! 

Often the problem isn't even 
thought of. When outreach is 
done, it's often done in an 
awkward, unthinking 

manner, unfamiliar with 
third-world problems and 
culture: "We want you 
people to join us to fight the 
local utility that owns the 
nuclear plant" -- even when 
"you people" may be more 
concerned about the utility's 
high rates. 

Again and again at rallies I've heard "How 
come more Blacks aren’t here, we should really try 
to get them here," when the Holly Near clones that 
pass for culture at such demos are hardly palatable 
to the rap generation. The idea of demonstrating, 
and especially of civil disobedience, is not taken 
lightly by third-worlders who experience more po- 
lice violence and heavier charges at street actions. 

One could go on and on. Many of the ways in 
which the anti-nuclear movement is alienated from 
and alienates third-world people applies equally to 
the former's relationship to poor and traditional 
working-class whites. The point is that different 
segments of people must be approached on their 



own terms. One should never go to people living in 
ghettos and on reservations saying "join our cause", 
but we should say "what can we do for you", and 
then work together within that context. Others' 
struggles should be supported for their own 
validity, not for one's own gain, with an eye to- 
ward joint work. 

BANG was formed just after Three Mile Is- 
land, and the members voted for a multi-issue anti- 
racist perspective rather than a single-issue cam- 
paign. In all our literature, we not only called for 
the shutdown of Indian Point (our local nuclear 
power plant), but for an end to high rates; an end to 
Con Edison's (the plant owner) racist and sexist 
hiring and promotions; an end to illegal shut-offs 
and high deposits that hit 
minorities, single mothers 
and the elderly the worst; an 
end to their gentrifying 
Renaissance program; and, 
last but not least, community 
control over utilities and 
energy policy. 

We translated our 
literature into Spanish for 
NYC's large Spanish- 
speaking population. Al- 
though we did have minimal 
mixed racial membership at 
times, we knew that basic 
multi-racial work would take 
the form of a coalition. So 
BANG became friendly with 
FightBack, a primarily Black 
and Hispanic workers' 
organization. FightBack had 
a militant history of fighting 
to integrate Con Ed work 
crews, and was also 
committed to a public takeover of Con Ed and 
closing Indian Point. They were featured speakers 
at our first rally; we supported their position paper 
on a lack of concern in the anti-nuclear movement 
for issues of the poor and minorities; and members 
of both groups took part in Friday night potlucks. 
We pushed hard for our community perspective and 
demands in anti-nuclear coalitions, and were 
successful despite often heavy resistance. We 
successfully insisted on having third-world input 
and speakers at rallies. Coalition literature took up 
BANG-like demands. 

Some notable confrontations stood out, 
though. One was a rally at Con Ed's Brooklyn 
headquarters called by The Brooklyn Alliance for 




page 14 KICK IT OVER U 26 


Survival, of which BANG was a member. Through 
BANG, Black Veterans for Social Justice were in- 
vited to speak, and their rep reacted to the debate 
on whether to include third-world concerns in the 
anti-nuclear movement with a very straightforward 
speech. But when he said something like "you 
know, maybe they should drop the bomb on you 
all, then you'd know what our lives are like because 
our neighbourhoods are already bombed out, and 
then you might be sensitive to our needs" some of 
the Alliance, particularly members of Mobilization 
for Survival, were blown out and that was the end 
of that coalition! Unfortunate, because that rally 
was racially mixed, one of the few truly multi-racial 
anti-nuclear events ever (at least that we knew of).. 

We did a lot of community organizing, and 
work with native Americans (supporting South 
Dakota's Yellow Thunder Camp set up in the ura- 
nium rich black hills by traditional Lakotas). Indian 
Point certainly wasn't shut down, but Con Ed as a 
whole was circumscribed and made to limit its rate 
hikes and shut-off and deposit policies due to ef- 
forts of local utility reform groups with whom 
BANG had worked. BANG helped integrate anti- 
racist and working-class concerns into certain local 
anti-nuclear struggles. We helped initiate the Third 
World and Progressive Peoples' Coalition, but 
BANG was the sole anti-nuclear group in the coali- 
tion. It had no Hispanic or native representation, 
and the support of pro-Soviet groups precluded ex- 
pressions of solidarity with dissident disarmament 
currents in the Soviet bloc (which, like third 
worlders, are often excluded from the mainstream 
disarmament agenda). The coalition folded rather 
shortly, and BANG became so depleted of members 
and energy that it only exists as a name. 

However, BANG'S experiences can aid those 
who'd like to attempt similar coalition building 
with minority and third world groups; I'd like to 
hear from others who've been involved in similar 
work, as I know people in other regions, as well as 
many environmentalists and anarchists, have been. 
Bob McGlynn 
528 5th Street 
Brooklyn, NY, 

USA 11215. 

condensed from a paper by the author 


Confronting Media Stereotypes 

FLORIDA: In Gainesville, the murder of five stu- 
dents was followed by a rally at which several 
speakers discussed violence against wimmin. The 


media consistently refused to cover this portion of 
their remarks, "as if strong wimmin threatened 
them" according to one local feminist. Media sto- 
ries reflected only the mourning and fear of the 
participants, not their strength, defiance or denun- 
ciation of our male supremacist society. 

One member of Gainesville Women's Libera- 
tion commented: "In the first couple of days after 
the murders, I found myself believing that die fear 
and resignation portrayed in the media was really 
the way most wimmin were feeling. But then I be- 
gan to notice that many more of us were taking ac- 
tion to fight back, getting a gun or putting a base- 
ball bat at the door and going on living our lives." 
Local feminists are organizing Take Back The 
Night rallies to encourage wimmen to act for their 
self defense and to build a movement. 

Liberation News Service 


Direct Action Defended 

VERMONT: Burlington citizens who tore down 
the fences marking off a piece of waterfront land 
which was scheduled for a luxury condo have ex- 
pressed solidarity with Berliners who took the wall 
down, with Mohawks who defend their ancestral 
lands from Canadian developers, and with the 
northcoast environmentalists who are using civil 
disobedience to save the last of the old-growth 
Redwood trees. The group's manifesto states that 
only by moving outside the system can we change 
it. 

Liberation News Service 


Save the Strait Marathon 

NANAIMO: On August 24 of this year, hundreds 
of participants are expected to swim, kayak, canoe 
or windsurf for 26 km across Georgia Straight to 
Hammond Bay, just north of Nanaimo, to focus at- 
tention on the pollution of Georgia Strait and en- 
courage people to participate in a clean-up. Last 
summer over 200 people took part in the first 
marathon, and at least double the number are ex- 
pected this year. Some swimmers will try to cover 
the entire distance, while others work in teams. 

Among the 55 small craft in last year's 
Marathon was a "paper boat" made from recycled 
materials, including hundreds of paper bags. 

Save Georgia Strait Alliance 
Box 122 Gabriola Island, 

British Columbia VOR 1X0 


SUMMER 1991 page 15 


FROM BUYING CO-OP TO POLITICAL ACTION 


Editors' note : The following is abridged from a 
longer article which appeared in the Autumn 1988 
issue of Green Revolution. 


23 years ago, a Tokyo housewife organized 
200 of her neighbouring housewives to buy milk 
collectively. From that modest start, the influential 
Seikatsu Club Co-operative movement in Japan has 
grown into a current membership of 155,000, em- 
bracing over 100 branches, each composed of 
roughly 500-1000 members in ten prefectures 
throughout the nation, employing a full-time staff 
of 700. By 1988 there were 153,000 members in 
various branches throughout Japan. 

Motivated by the fundamental need to combat 
rising prices, in June 1965 one housewife from 
Tokyo's Setagaya district organized 200 women to 
buy 300 bottles of milk. Though it was not offi- 
cially founded until 1968, in a sense, this was the 
Seikatsu Club's first collective purchase. 

What started as a strategy to save money, 
however, gradually developed over the next 20 
years into a philosophy encompassing "the whole of 
life." In addition to cost-effective collective pur- 
chase, the club is committed to a host of social con- 
cerns, including the environment, the empowerment 
of women and workers' conditions. 

In order to cope with rising competition with 
supermarkets and other co-operatives, many co-ops 
have sought to expand by decreasing investment 
and increasing dividends. But we believe that our 
business should be run by our own investments. 
This is part of the club's vision to reduce the divi- 
sion between producer, consumer and investor. 
When members join the co-op, they make an initial 
investment of 1000 yen. This, supplemented by 
monthly contributions of 1000 yen, brings the aver- 
age investment to roughly 47,000 yen per person, 
which is returned whenever a member leaves the 
co-op. 

Our investment strategy has been highly suc- 
cessful, although the membership (155,000) ranks 
ninth out of Japan’s 700 co-ops. For instance, we 
are fourth in terms of investment capital, which to- 
tals 7.5 billion yen. Because the point of investment 
is not profit, the club does not offer dividends to its 
members. 

SUMMER 1991 page 16 


BUYING POLICIES 

The Seikatsu Club utilizes a unique collective 
purchase system which relies on (a) advance orders, 
(b) distribution and payment based on a "han" or 
group, (c) the concept of "one product one variety," 
which limits the availability of any given item to a 
single brand. 

Although most co-ops offer a wide range of 
merchandise, the club handles only 400 products in 
total. We believe that limiting quantity ensures 
quality; as a result, we offer only one version of 
any given product. Soy sauce is produced in nu- 
merous sizes and shapes in Japan, but we provide 
nothing other than one litre glass bottles of thick 
soy. Though limiting variety, the club is able to 
streamline production and distribution. It also en- 
ables us to make special demands of producers -- 
like leaving out preservatives. 

The club also feels that limiting options culti- 
vates creativity in daily life. We do not deal with 
salad dressing, for example, because we want to en- 
courage members to make their own. 

RESPECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 

We refuse to handle products if they are detri- 
mental to the health of our members or the en- 
vironment. Synthetic detergents, artificial seasoning 
and clothing made with fluorescents are all off lim- 
its, even if members make demands for them. 

But our commitment to the environment is far 
more extensive than that. For one thing, the club 
gets safer produce by cooperating with local farm- 
ers. In return for asking them to use organic fertil- 
izer and fewer chemicals, members buy a con- 
tracted amount of produce, and agree to overlook 
physical imperfections if they exist. Members also 
assist farmers with the harvest when their labour is 
necessary. 

We stand by the belief that housewives can 
create a society that is harmonious with nature by 
"taking action from the home.” And, through our 
purchases and consumption, we are attempting to 
change the way that Japanese agriculture and fish- 
eries are operated. As a symbolic gesture of societal 


responsibility for past crimes due to careless indus- 
trialization, we buy summer oranges from families 
with Minamata disease. 

When the club cannot find products which 
meet our quality, ecological or social standards, we 
will consider starting our own enterprise. This can 
be illustrated by the two organic milk production 
facilities we currently run with local dairy farmers. 

We also have an 
agreement .with an organic 
agricultural co-op in the 
Shounai district of Yamagata 
prefecture: beginning with 
rice in 1972, it gradually 
expanded to vegetables and 
fruit, and now accounts for 
30% of our total purchases. 

Buying directly from 
producers does more than 
merely eliminate the 
middleman's added dis- 
tribution cost. It enhances 
cooperation and awareness 
by keeping consumers in 
touch with the production 
process. That is why our 
annual summer excursion to 
Shounai, which has attracted 
more than 1000 members 
since 1974, is so meaningful. 


tial and make a constructive contribution to their 
local communities. The co-op is also expanding in 
Korea, but because Korean law does not yet 
acknowledge the co-op system it operates there as 
one of the businesses of a mutual credit organiza- 
tion. 

The Seikatsu Club also runs a Mutual Benefit 
Fund, a service which goes beyond simply selling 


EXPANDING 

SOCIETY 


INTO 


When they observed the 
advantages of natural over 
synthetic soap, many of the 
women began to lobby for 
the banning of synthetics. 

Although these efforts were 
by and large unsuccessful, 
they caused the membership 
to seek a more active role in 
politics. It has succeeded in getting 33 members 
elected at the municipal level, and in the process 
given women a vehicle for political involvement. 

Members have also expanded into the social 
sector, starting a variety of workers' collectives in 
such businesses as recycling, "bento," (Japanese 
style boxed lunches) and home helper businesses. 
These enable members to work to their full poten- 



insurance as a product. Participants contribute 200 
yen per month in exchange for monetary assistance 
in case of accident or illness. Also, psychological 
support and, if necessary, voluntary labour help, is 
provided. The not-for-profit fund is managed by a 
committee. 


SUMMER 1991 page 17 






A WOMAN ALONE WITH HER SELF 

I knew we were headed for trouble when he said 

I think I'm falling in love with you 

and I was thinking how a kiss 

can blossom into lust so quickly 

no matter who 

Listen. Just because you create the illusion 

of not being alone 

doesn't mean I buy it 

I watch you all alone together 

and I know fine lines when I see them 

I know you crave your freedom 

and then you cannot stand it 

I know about the buddy system 

I see it coming to get you 

I'm a woman alone with her self 
I mean, men are a nice place to visit 
I just don't want to live there 
and I want to say yes to everything 
I want to say yes to 

and you know how men can be about that 

A woman alone with her self 
I mean, hanging with a man just takes 
too much breath 
You have to spend all your time 
on forgiveness and you know what? 

I don't have that much forgiveness left 
and I need most of it 
for myself 

You know what I hate, though? 

Saturday nights, New Years Eve, Valentines Day, 

Cold, rainy Sunday afternoons 
Anniversaries without the occasion 

You know what I like? 

Sleeping when I feel like it 
and waking up with words 
Eating cheese blintzes for dinner 
Seven nights a week if I want to 
I like having lots of secrets 
I like not looking back 

A woman alone with her self 
A ready suitcase, hat in hand 
Each time I go to leave 
Her dancing shoes 
Hide in my dreams 

Gail A. Sctiilke 


SUMMER 1991 page 18 


LIVING THE SPIRIT 


AN INTERVIEW WITH PAULA GUNN ALLEN 


Pat Andrade: Could you tell me a bit about how 
the anthology Living the Spirit, a Gay American In- 
dian Anthology, came about? Certainly in terms of 
finding voices -- taking control of images, it is a 
very important book. 

Paula Gunn Allen: Let me go all the way back -- 
long ago in 1974 or 1975 there was a young man 
called Randy Burns, who has functioned as presi- 
dent or vice-president for Gay American Indians for 
a number of years. He was a student at San Fran- 
cisco State at the time I was teaching there and he 
came to me and said that he wanted to form a 
group, a club off-campus, called Gay American In- 
dians devoted to, among other things, to unearthing 
the history of gay Indians throughout America, and 
compiling an archive. He wanted to know if I could 
help - and I could help -- 1 could help but not a lot. 

I'm not an historian but I could at least lend 
vocal support, and that's something I did. I went to 
a couple meetings which were really neat. All these 
years later, GAI is still trying to get all this stuff to- 
gether. In the meanwhile there are a lot of writers, 
storytellers, who are gay, who are publishing. So, I 


think consequently, as a result of this life long 
dream, not just of Randy's, but other people who 
got involved in GAI over the years, I think that's 
how the anthology was germinated. 

Then, there was a man who belonged to GAI, 
who is himself not Native who edited the book, and 
that's Will Roscoe, and he was willing to take the 
time and go through the very difficult task of 
putting together an anthology. It's a very difficult 
process. So, he compiled both contemporary and 
ethnographic material from everywhere and then 
compiled them into a book. What you see is the fi- 
nal result of a lot of editing, a lot of culling. I think 
I am not as happy with the book as with the 
prospectus I read. I think, and I don't know this, 
but I guess, it got cut down by the necessities of 
trying to get a publisher. So there are a lot of tradi- 
tional materials that aren't in there that I would 
have loved to have seen. There is work by a woman 
who is a very fine writer, but she is not herself a 
Lesbian. That bothers me. There is work by people 
who are not Indians, about Indians, that bothers 
me. And there is a frontispiece by a well known 
white writer who has spent a lot of time ripping off 
Indians, and has made quite the career from it, and 



SUMMER 1991 page 19 




there she is in the frontispiece, and I'm kinda re- 
sponsible for that in ways I don't want to go into in 
public, and I'm kinda bothered by that -- but mostly 
I think that the book would have been a larger book 
if there had been an appropriate publication outlet 
for what Roscoe had originally compiled. 

As it is, the book is a beginning. It's got some 
really good stuff in it. I like the book -- it's like a 
promise for future books that might come out. I 
have no idea how it’s doing at the booksellers so I 
don't know it it’s going to be re-issued, because 
that kind of thing tends to generate new volumes. 
Homosexuality, male or female, was openly prac- 
ticed among large numbers of tribes, prior to Euro- 
pean conquest, which in some cases, means prior to 
1925. We are not talking of long ago. 

Among many traditional people today, gay 
people, lesbians, are perfectly reasonable members 
of the community. Everyone knows their sexual 
preference, and nobody's arguing with it or putting 
it down, or ridiculing it, but out in the larger world 
you don't acknowledge it; you don't, because they 
are going to come, and they are going to kill you 
all, because they don't approve of your sexuality. 
They aren't even going to make distinctions. They 
will kill everybody -- they don't care -- they can't 
tell one Indian from another, we all know this so 
nobody says anything. I consider those alienated 
from traditional culture -- so often they think they 
are very traditional , but they have been highly 
christianized, and they are very homophobic. They 
are terrified of homosexuals, they want them out, 
dead, beaten up; and some ugly stuff has happened 



to gay people in Native communities -- I've heard 
some awful stories. People have been badly hurt, 
physically, emotionally, spiritually. 

On the whole, my correspondence with people 
who are gay men or lesbians indicates to me that, 
by and large, there is a great deal of community 
support -- it's just not very big, not very loud, it 
might even be silent, but is large, notwithstanding 
some of the exceptions I have mentioned. The 
problem with the exceptions is that they are what 
are noticeable, and when lesbians or gay men are 
speaking to the lesbian and gay community they 
tend to focus on the homophobic responses and not 
to focus on the accepting responses, which is a real 
problem. Our gay community wants to play "Oh, 
ain't it awful," and so we sit down and we want to 
play too, so we come up with all the horror stories 
that we can think of. 

I find that, by and large, the level of support is 
probably about seventy percent and the other thirty 
percent is not very supportive; and that seventy 
percent ranges from indifference to warmly ac- 
cepting and that thirty percent goes from irritated, 
doesn't like it very much to vigourously trying to 
combat it -- stamp it out. - Some people I know 
have been ostracized from the reservation. A couple 
have been declared spiritually dead. Some have 
been jailed on reservations, in tribal jails, vilified 
and abused. 

These were young people, but on the whole 
the letters I get, the folks I talk to, the gay Indian 
people [say] there isn’t as much of that going on as 
you might think. There is an ambivalence in the In- 
dian world about sex roles, gender roles, and about 
everything you can imagine, because we are re- 
quired to live in a white world, but we are not 
white. We don't think like white people; our tradi- 
tions are not white, they are not European, they are 
not Christian; but at the same time we are Chris- 
tian, we are educated in their school system, we do 
watch their television, read their books, all those 
things. So we have within images of the white 
world and images of our own parts and we often 
don't know which is the one that is truest to our 
own way. 

We get mixed up, and you see what that 
makes happen in respect to homosexuality, as it 
happens in respect to battery, and how to raise kids, 
how to deal with the old people, how to spend 
tribal funds, whether or not we ought to be profes- 
sionals and have our own group of lobbyists, and 
until they come to terms with that, frankly, their 
life isn't going to be very good even if we all van- 
ish, even if there wasn't an Indian left in the world 


page 20 KICK IT OVER H26 


their own memory will never let them rest. They 
are very foolish to think that if they obliterate us it 
will all go away. They don't belong here. They 
stole this, it isn't theirs, and they won't pay for it. 
They won’t admit it and they won't talk about it, 
but there is a lot we can do about it. We can stop 
accepting our stories about who we are, we can quit 
listening to them, we can teach our children to 
stand up in the classroom and say "that's not true." 
We can teach them to say, "You call my mother or 
my dad or my uncle and they will come and talk to 
the children about what the truth is about us. We 
can do those things and I think we had better. We 
have got to decide we are not the brutes that we 
were described as. We are going to destroy us our- 
selves. We don't need them to destroy us anymore - 
- and they know it. 

Pat: In talking about the way time has distorted, 
erased, aspects of life as if existed before, certainly 
something that I have noticed is the incredible si- 
lence that exists around the whole issue of native 
people who are gay and lesbian, and I think that's 
the key word for me, really, in terms of my per- 
sonal experiences — is the silence — there is such an 
incredible silence. I can't emphasize that too much. 
Do you want to address that? 

Paula: The thunderous silence. I think that it's a 
very complicated issue. When I wrote the essay that 
was at the time called Beloved Women -- Lesbian- 
ism in Native American Culture that is in Sacred 
Hoop, I spoke at the National Lesbian and Gay 
March in Washington in 1978, and a woman who 
edited Conditions magazine, which is a lesbian 
magazine in New York city, came up to me after 
my minute and a half -- 1 think I had a minute and a 
half -- to say something. She came to me and asked 
me if I could write an article for the journal. She 
wanted it for a year and a half from then, so it was 
easy for me to say, "Oh, sure." 

Well, I agonized for over a year because I 
know the white man doesn't approve of homosexu- 
als or lesbians -- in fact, he tends to think that's 
cause for murder. It's okay to kill people if you 
don't like their sexual orientation, and of course 
you don't like their sexual orientation if it's any- 
thing other than heterosexual, missionary position 
monogamous let's get married and have babies. 
You don't like it if it's anything other than that, so 
you kill it. And I know the white man's tendency to 
kill anything that he doesn't like - which, by the 
way, I don't think is a characteristic of the so-called 
right wing community, I think it's a characteristic 


of Americans in general: they don't like it, they kill 
it. They have different ways of talking about that, 
but that's essentially what they want to do. It's the 
frontier ethic. Get a gun. 

Anyway, then, there is the problem of how the 
world around us thinks about Indians -- if they 
think about us at all. We are people, who should be 
vanquished, should be destroyed, should be killed. 
If the Indian people do anything to attract negative 
attention, it tends to result in the death of an Indian 
or three or ten. So my fear was if I said anything at 
all about lesbianism in the traditional world of Na- 
tive America before the white man, after the white 
man, without respect to the white man, then I was 
inviting that gun to come in and blow us away. I 
had no right to do that; no one had any right to do 
that, we had to live. In the Indian community the 
silence you are hearing is the consequence of ex- 
actly that. 

We don't like to talk about the violence, we 
don't like to deal with it. We don't like to talk 
about the forced sterilization of Indian women and 
men at Indian health service hospitals or public 
health service hospitals. We don’t want to deal with 
any of this stuff. We feel helpless, we feel power- 



SUMMER1991 page 21 


less, and we feel useless to do anything about it, 
but we also have an enormous tendency to believe 
the white stories about us. Since we are savages, 
hostile, horrible people who murdered all those in- 
nocent women and children during the white set- 
tlement period -- since that's how we are -- how can 
we ask for anything else, how can we expect that 
the men don't beat up the women, how can we ex- 
pect that there isn't a lot of disease and disturbance 
and violence and suicide among us? That's what all 
the white books say, and that's what they teach us 
in schools about ourselves, so how can we expect it 
to be any different? All we can do is hope that some 
white will come and save us from ourselves because 
we are no good, and that tends to generate a hope- 
lessness and that hopelessness tends to generate vi- 
olence. There is no place else to go with that anger 
except for it to implode inwardly, and it does im- 
plode inwardly. 

So we have a combination of forces working 
here to add to this horror of battering, abuse and vi- 
olence that needs to stop. One of the issues is that 
we have been defined as a violent people. It took a 
long time to convince us, but propaganda always 
works eventually. If you control everything they 
think you can get them to believe it, and so we are 


believing this nonsense. We also tend to believe 
that should die, we should vanish. Our teen suicide 
rate is the highest for any group in the nation, be- 
cause these children are believing they should die, 
because they are being told that over and over again 
-- the Indians all went away -- the Indians all died -- 
I am an Indian -- 1 must be dead. 

My nephew was taken by his mom to one of 
the dances by the pueblos. He was little, maybe 
three or so, and she kept saying for him to go out 
and dance; but no, he wouldn't, and finally, in 
great indignation because she wouldn't ignore him, 
he said, "I can't dance, I'm not Indian", and she 
said, "Miguel, yes you are, you are Indian, you can 
dance," He said, "I am not Indian, I am not dead." 

You see, he had watched his morning car- 
toons, he knew what the truth was, and our children 
are killing themselves because they are Indians, 
therefore they must be dead, and they die. The 
power of image is utterly terrifying. It leads to bat- 
tery, it leads to rape, it leads to demoralization at 
levels that are almost impossible to contemplate. It 
leads to death at all levels, which of course in the 
long run leaves the white world happy because they 
wouldn't have to think about us any more, of what 
they did or what they are doing. 


On Growing Up Indian 


by Randy Lewis 

The reason you have Indians who have be- 
come part of the gay world isn't by choice. The gay 
world is a sub-culture; it is a community that has 
been designed because they cannot exist within 
their own culture, so they have created their own 
family, mostly in urban areas. American Indians, 
Alaska natives, Canadian natives, finding they can- 
not exist in their own communities have become 
part of these communities; but as a whole Indians 
don't feel they belong to them because first of all 
most Indians I know who I talk to nothing is more 
paramount in their lives than their orientation, their 
forced orientation, as far as being Indians. 

Sexuality doesn't define them; it doesn't de- 
fine who the run around with, what they do; their 
Indian-ness does. Yet we deny them that right, we 
deny them the right to be Natives, to be Indians 
from their communities. We may not be overt about 
it -- hell, we can be quite sneaky and shady about 


it, we can undermine them as children. I know a lot 
of children who grew up in Salilo, whose grand- 
mothers raised them, and everyone in Salilo spoke 
Indian. Everyone. I can't think of anyone down 
there who didn't; even the store owner who was 
white spoke Indian, and you could always tell those 
kids whose grandmothers brought them up because 
they sounded like old women when they were four 
years old, That was pretty okay, though, because 
when kids are about five years old and start going 
to school and running around with each other, they 
make the break themselves, they see how other lit- 
tle boys make that transition. 

One of the greatest crimes one could commit 
was pointing to them and saying, "Look, he talks 
like a woman." I never heard that done. That would 
be a crime on you, not on the child. It would be re- 
flected on you so you never saw that; but now, 
should it happen, a father would probably disown 
his child, but that's okay for the most part because 


page 22 KICK IT OVER #26 


most fathers may father their children, but they 
hardly ever are parents to their children. I say that 
for fact, because I know it; I've watched my broth- 
ers. 

These are some of the greatest sport fuckers in 
the world. They go from basketball tournament to 
basketball tournament laying their seeds across the 
country. They don't know where half their family 
is. I come from a family of seventeen kids. When 
my dad died there were six stepwives there. It's not 
uncommon. I find that throughout Indian country. 
Yet we have these double standards -- men can go 
out sowing their wild oats wherever they care to; 
that's morally acceptable, or at least it has been un- 
til this time. I think gradually I see more women as- 
serting a few more laws and rights within their own 
home, but it's been a false sense of values, and 
maybe an over-emphasis on a man’s role that has 
kind of clouded a lot of things, and I started won- 
dering why. 

I think one of the reasons is, (or what I sur- 
mise to be the reason,) you know, a century ago 
our people were not many more in numbers, actu- 
ally, but our men had a 
meaningful place within 
the tribe. We were 

hunters, we were 

warriors, we were 

protectors of our people; 

I call them horse libera- 
tors, I don't call them 
horse thieves, I call them 
horse liberators because 
the people we took them 
from had no respect for 
them to begin with, so 
we liberated them from 
the white people. We 
had a place; men had a 
place within the culture. 

Since then, reservations 
having been established, 
a man's role, a man's 
occupation came to an 
end also, or at least 
discredited it. 

So, what happened 
to him? Well, for the 
early stages, there were 
very few men who 
survived. I think that's a 
real reflection if you 
start looking at it. There 
were very few men; our 


existence, or subsistence, became dependant on the 
non-Indian culture, through annuities, rations being 
delivered to the reservation, mostly just to barely 
stave off starvation. We were given plows and 
jackasses; people who had no land that could be 
farmed — we were given land that was unfarmable, 
in areas white people didn't want. We were given 
these impossibilities to exist, but still we existed; 
but it doesn't deny the fact that our role model, our 
men's role model, was gone. All it takes is that one 
generation, two generations. 

You women are lucky; your role stayed intact. 

I am not saying it's been easy, but you were fortu- 
nate in that respect; you are still the head of the 
household, not always by choice either; you are the 
mother, you are the keeper of the culture and in 
most cases the maintainer of the language, the 
nurse, the cook. I know they are not very glam- 
ourous, you can’t romanticize about them very 
much, but your role, your employment, was a lot 
more secure. 

Little girls had something they could look up 
to, little boys didn't. The role model they were 



SUMMER 1991 page 23 


given was a drunk, again and again, not by choice, 
and is it a wonder that things have gotten where it 
is? Our role models were cowboys who came and 
went, "weekend warriors", I guess you could call 
them, people who hung around the bars, people 
who never hung around home. 

I was very fortunate in that respect because I 
had my great-grandparents; they knew better than 
to leave me with my mom. She had all she could do 
just to put food on the table, when she was support- 
ing a household full of children; and you know 
what's worse -- she was raising children and she 
was raising her husband, because we have little 
boys who grow up to be big boys, and they always 
have mom. I'm sure you have seen it. You go to 
Indian homes, you always have the older boys 
hanging around and hanging around. You never 
outgrow your children, they are always there, and 
finally you get lucky and you die. Well, someone 
has to take the place of mom, so we get married and 
condemn some poor woman to a sentence in which 
there is neither pardon or parole: to forever be a 
mom to her husband, to her children. I mean, she'll 
be lucky if she has all daughters, then she will raise 
them and then she will just have her husband to 
raise. 

It's done nothing for our boys; it’s created a 
lot of strife and factionalism, a lot of division and a 
hell of a lot of misunderstanding in Indian commu- 
nities, and a hell of a lot of friction. On my reser- 
vation, you know what the ratio is? There are six 
women to every man. That's due to a hell of a lot 
of suicide, homicide, fratricide, not to mention in- 
cest, child abandonment, alcoholism and drug ad- 
diction to the point of total oblivion. You know, the 
women on our reservation are the most highly edu- 
cated, highly skilled, not to mention dedicated with 
the greatest amount of conviction of any of the 
workers of the employable work force -- yet they 
hold the lowest of all the paying jobs, the lowest 
rung on the ladder in employment. The people we 
have in charge of our reservation -- we have four- 
teen people in the duly elected business council — 
and practically every one of them are men. 

My father was a great example for me in one 
way, because I was able to see someone who had 
such immense love for his friends, his rodeo 
friends, the cowboys he hung out with. There was 
great camaraderie there. He showed them such love 
and generosity. But as for me, a dog could have 
done what my dad did for me as a father. He never 
showed the same love for his own children because 
it didn't fit into the image of Indian men. He was 


only allowed to show such camaraderie to his 
friends. 

A lot of Indian men are scared shitless. They 
have inherited and absorbed the Catholic virtues of 
guilt and shame. They are terrified of their sexual- 
ity, often trying to prove they are the barbarians 
that the media makes them out to be. There is a 
whole pub culture that's operating, where men sit 
around the pub all day and drink, and so what if 
they don't come home? They have some woman at 
home that will feed the kids, take care of them, and 
woe to the woman tfho deviates from that role. The 
men will beat the shit out of them, often deliber- 
ately disfiguring them so that no other man will 
look at them. The men are trapped in the image of 
what has been created for them and they will deal 
severely with those who deviate from that image. 

I say to the women: you got to take power. 
Don't let them give you anything. If they give it to 
you, it ain't worth a fuck; you have got to take that 
power in order to show that you have the capacity 
to do so. It's like when colonists say, "We will give 
Indian people land rights." Bullshit! They aren't 
giving us fuck-all, we as Indian people are re- 
taining those land rights. 

I see a lot of men condescendingly and pa- 
tronizingly giving women the right to do things -- 
that's bullshit. Experience has shown me that men 
aren't as concerned with the consequences of their 
decision making but with the fact that they have the 
power to make decisions. 

I recently went back to the high school that I 
graduated from to make the commencement ad- 
dress. When I was at school, out of 160 Indians, 
four of us graduated. On this visit I saw one of my 
white teachers. I remember her saying that she was 
going to make damn sure we learnt English. And I 
sure learnt English, in fact I learnt it better than the 
white kids. And I went up to this former teacher 
and said something to her in my language. She was 
totally flabbergasted. She didn't understand what I 
was saying. I said to her, "You have been here 
thirty years, and you don't speak a word of Indian! 
Who are you calling dumb?" 

Education, which is meant to help us survive, 
has instead been an exercise in cultural disintegra- 
tion. Indian education is the last frontier of the 
Puritans. 

I'm not giving up on Indian people. They 
might not like me, I might be an irritant to them, 
but they are stuck with me. A lot of Indian gays and 
lesbians just give up on their Indian communities 
too quickly. 


page 24 KICK IT OVER U26 


Surviving Child Abuse 


by Cheryl Bonfanti 

I am a survivor of child sexual abuse and it 
has taken me some time to be able to admit it to 
myself that, yeah, I have family members that do 
not meet my expectations of what a family should 
be like This part I cannot change, no matter how 
hard I try or want. I am married now for the second 
time, and i truly feel that my husband is the right 
mate for me for a life of happiness and love to- 
gether. 

My abuse started when I was between the ages 
of 8 -- 9 years old and continued until I was old 
enough to stop it myself at age 16. When I started 
to threaten to tell all of the neighbours and the 
preacher in our small town community, I was told 
that I was crazy and that I needed to be put in a 
mental institution. At one point my father even 
tried to have me committed to the Lynchburg 
Training School and Hospital for mentally ill peo- 
ple. 

I am now doing an 11 -year sentence because 
$56.00 meant more to my sister and her husband 
than my going to prison. This was his way of get- 
ting his revenge and getting me to shut up 
and to stop talking about this sexual abuse. 

The justice system was his back-up, and it 
fell for all his lies. That's a small town court 
system for you. 

In December of 1987 I entered the 
Virginia Correctional Centre for Women, in 
Goochland, VA. Here I have gotten the first 
chance to talk openly about my anger, hate 
and frustration over what has happened to 
me in my childhood. I am in a group of less 
than ten women, and we all have horror 
stories that we do not want publicized or 
printed on the front page of the local 
newspaper. By being in this group, I have 
been able to get all of these negative feelings 
out and start communications that are sin- 
cere. I would like to say that a lot of women 
that are here in prison need some type of 
support, and even though the types of 
support groups are few and far between I am 
so lucky to be a part of this group. Thank 
you, group members, for giving me the 
courage to write this article. 

For as long as I can remember I have 
been so mad at the world, and really didn't 
know why, but I knew that my life was 
nothing more than a big fat lie. I had 


pretended that I had the iderl - .Jhood and the 
ideal parents, and all the time I hated the whole idea 
of what I was hiding and running from. I just didn't 
know how to get out of the lie or what to do. 

When I first got here at the prison I put myself 
into all of the educational and outside programs that 
I could find. I had open space, and could run for- 
ever and not have to think about any of it until bed 
time. One day, that all changed when my counselor 
called me to her office. When I walked in, there sat 
another counsellor that headed up the survivors' 
group. At that time. I knew this was not going to be 
a good day to talk. I had to go through all of my 
garbage, and together all three of us cried and held 
each other for support. I couldn't run any longer, 
and the answers that I had been looking for were 
not to be found in any text book. I have since that 
time gone through my story again and again but, 
each time I do I learn more about myself. In the 
process, I continue to cry away my pain if that's 
possible. The members of the group give me 
courage to keep digging and be able to go on with 
my life and to be a better person in the long run. 



SUMMER 1991 page 25 


My family continues to deny that any of this 
ever happened to me during my childhood. I know 
it is the truth, and I am the one who has to carry it 
around and deal with the scars of it all. The scars 
will last forever, but the pain has to be dealt with 
and made to go away. In order to do that, you have 
to be able to talk about it openly with others who 
have been in your shoes before. You are going to 
need lots of support from friends and family that 
are willing to hear you out and not judge you or 
blame you for what has happened in the past. When 


you find that person you have a real friend and a 
firm support system. 

I want to encourage all wimmin in and out of 
prison, if you have a horror story that you have 
been carrying around for years, find a good strong 
support group and give it all the extra baggage you 
have. You'll feel better to get it all out. 

In most of the prisons there will be one group 
that stands out above the rest and this is the one that 
stands out here at VCCW. 


LOOKING TO OUR ROOTS 

GROWING UP UKRAINIAN IN CANADA 


By Alys Murphy 

My parents were people of the land. My father 
was from near Rohatin, my mother from near 
Skalat. They met and married in Toronto, and were 
active in Ukrainian Hall activities until 1945, when 
we moved to Scarborough, a suburb of Toronto. It 
seems every Saturday and Sunday of my childhood 
was occupied attending either weddings and 
popravlinya, or 25th anniversaries. Those were my 
connections to the Ukrainian community. 

When I was growing up in Scarborough, then 
an almost exclusively Anglo environment, being 
Ukrainian was not something to be proud of. My 
names were mangled and happily mispronounced, 
as though it was an accomplishment not to be able 
to say them, until I could hardly wait to change by 
marriage to an Anglo name that I would not have to 
pronounce, explain or spell ever again. When my 
mother came to school functions, teachers would 
talk at her through me. They would say things in 
English to me, and I would turn and say them in 
English to her. Eventually, she stopped coming to 
the functions. 

My leather boots, sheepskin-lined and care- 
fully made by Nick Sendun, were an object of 
ridicule at school. In turn, I hurt my parents, who 
had scrimped to provide them, remembering bare- 
foot winters. I demanded boots from Eaton's, rub- 
ber ones like everyone else's. When my parents in- 
vited my schoolmates to supper in the gracious way 
of all Ukrainians, suspicious grimaces and "yuk" 
were the initial responses to the "funny" food -- 


until they tasted it. All the same, I got "jovial" 
comments about "garlic snappers." Need I go on? 

Perhaps only to mention the time when I was a 
little girl, and was present to hear two Anglos, for 
whom my father had done a favour, compliment 
him by comparing him to a "white" man. That one 
took me back a bit... I thought I was white, if I ever 
thought of it at all. Small things, you may think, 
and so they may be - but not to a child. They left 
their mark, and for many years I avoided being 
Ukrainian as hard as I could. 

In the process of learning things unrelated to 
being Ukrainian, I learned some things about being 



SUMMER 1991 page 26 



Ukrainian that shocked and surprised me. I learned 
that what my parents and I had experienced in this 
tolerant country was racism, I learned that racism is 
lies. I learned that one way to combat racism was to 
reclaim my culture proudly. I determined to unlearn 
the lies about who and what my people were, and to 
learn our true story. 

I started to read. Not history books. History 
books are written by people with the power to make 
the books say what they want, not what is true. 
History books are not about our people in Ukraine, 
they are about who ruled over us. I read about 
political prisoners, about anti-semitism, about 
fascistic elements, genocide by nuclear accident, 
about deliberate starvation of six million people in 
Ukraine. I read about the treatment of the first 
Ukrainian immigrants, about IQ tests created to 
keep Slavs out, about persecution of the 
Doukhoubors, stories of the IWW and the general 
strike, WW2 internment camps, and closing of our 
meeting places here in Canada. 

I have been finding out what has really hap- 
pened to us. How we were really treated through 
the past twenty centuries. I learned about who 
industrialized the land and exported the products to 
a central government, about invasions of Ukraine 
by those greedy to exploit and consume her re- 
sources, to subjugate and enslave our people to cre- 
ate their profit, to exterminate a way of life many 
thousands of years older than the history we are 
taught by rulers, and their enforcers, school, 
church and police. 

We have had our pride and dreams and dignity 
wrenched from us, our children taken away under 
various guises, our earth -based religions extermi- 


nated (preserved only in part by the cleverness of 
our wimmin.) We have been imprisoned for speak- 
ing or writing our language, punished for following 
our customs and culture, denied the ability to trace 
our connection to our ancestors through our 
mothers' line. 

All this for power and profit. 

The more things I learn about the history of 
Ukrainian people, the closer the parallels I see be- 
tween our history and the history of the indigenous 
people of Canada. Like us, they have had their na- 
tive land, language, culture, religion and children 
violently stolen from them. Have had their very 
names stolen from them. They too have been 
robbed, tortured, humiliated and murdered for the 
very same reasons -- power and profit. 

Too many of their people, like too many of 
our people, have sought temporary refuge from 
their pain in alcohol. We and they have been 
blamed for that pain and humiliation, and called 
dirty, ignorant, shiftless. Those who have fought 
back are denounced as criminals and terrorists by 
those who make the profits and hold the power. 

We, whose parents, grandparents and count- 
less ancestors have lived on and loved Ukrainian 
land for tens of thousands of years, have a respon- 
sibility. We who have endured racism have a re- 
sponsibility -- to not perpetuate it, and to not ignore 
it when it no longer directly injures us. Our respon- 
sibility is to actively oppose racism and to actively 
support those people here in Canada who are strug- 
gling for their own land, for their own self deter- 
mination. Is that not the essence of the struggle of 
our parents and grandparents, and which continues 
today in Ukraine? 

It is our ancient tradition to honour those who 
extend hospitality to us. This land belongs to those 
who are now engaged in their own struggle for life 
in Kanesatake... Lubicon... Kanewake... 
Ganienkhe... Restigouche. . . Temagami... Nitassi- 
nan... Akwesasne -- names that perhaps we don't 
learn to pronounce? 

I dedicate this diatribe with love and pride and 
respect to the memory ofmy father, Michael Choj- 
can — whose real name was Mikhaild Xoytson. 




w 



SUMMER 1991 page 27 


JOURNEYS THROUGH CENTRAL AMERICA 


MORALE HIGH, BUT LONG PEOPLES' WAR INEVITABLE 


by Jon Reed 

Editors' note: while we were in limbo, Kick It 
Over received several reports from Jon Reed, a 
writer travelling in Latin America. We found these 
first-hand reports interesting, and offer the 
following excerpts from some of his reports. 


I. Panama (Christmas, 1990) 

In the destabilized wake of Just Cause, the 
U.S. and the Endara junta have done little or noth- 
ing to help the nation's estimated 15,000 war 
refugees, who continue living in schools, in refugee 
camps and in the homes of relatives. Nor has the 
government done very much for the battered ma- 
jority population of the country -- the workers, stu- 
dents, Indians, campesinos, unemployed, and 
working poor. Despite a clamour by human rights 
organizations and the families of the killed and dis- 
appeared, neither the U.S. nor the Endara adminis- 
tration have offered anything substantial in the way 
or reparations, nor even minimal cooperation in 
identifying the dead and missing. In the light of 
what many Panamanians will tell you are thousands 
of dead and wounded -- many of whom, according 
to the opposition, lie hidden in unmarked mass 
graves inside U.S. military bases -- government 
callousness and indifference threaten to arouse a 
firestorm of anger. 

Isabel Corro, of the Association of Families of 
the Victims of December 20, summarizes the rising 
ire of many Panamanians: "One year after the inva- 
sion, the dead call out to us from the mass graves, 
demanding justice. Our orphans grieve for their 
parents, who will never see them grow up, who 
will never have the privilege of knowing their own 
children. None of the crimes of the invasion will be 
forgiven, and none of our victims will be forgot- 
ten." 

Recent polls indicate that the government has 
lost almost all of its support--with the notable ex- 
ception of the wealthy elite, whom the underclass 
derisively called the rabiblancos, the "white-tailed" 
oligarchy, who seem to be thoroughly enjoying 
their unfettered power and profit-gouging after 22 


years of populist (Omar Torrijos, 1968-81) and 
pseudo-populist (Manuel Noriega, 1981-89) mili- 
tary rule. Although most Panamanians are opposed 
to a military-style coup to unseat Endara, 86% of 
those approached in a recent poll stated that "social 
justice" is definitely lacking in today's Panama. 

As the Grinch Who Stole Christmas prepares 
for a 1991 mega-Blitzkrieg on the other side of the 
world, in the Persian Gulf, the grassroots rank-and- 
file of Panama are neither happy nor hopeful. Al- 
though an ever-broader segment of the grassroots 
are starting to get organized, common consensus 
has it that the fight for Panamanian sovereignty and 
social justice will be a long and uphill battle. 

December 20, 1990. One year to the day after 
the Yankee Blitzkrieg. Thousands of black-clad 
workers, professionals, students, wimmin, barrio 
dwellers, and families of the murdered and disap- 



SUMMER1991 page 28 


peared have assembled in front of the Church of El 
Carmen in a middle-class neighbourhood of Panama 
City. Beneath banners denouncing the U.S. South- 
ern Command's continued military occupation, and 
amidst placards condemning the political repres- 
sion, mass firings and neo-liberal shock treatment 
of the "Civilian Dictatorship of Guillermo Endara," 
an energetic and militant crowd surges and chants 
through the commercial district of the capital. 

The afternoon's protest is called La Marcha 
Negra, the Black March, or the March of Mourn- 
ing. The mobilization has been organized by the 
Association of Families of the Victims of the Inva- 
sion and by the Committee of the Rescue of 
(Panamanian) Sovereignty. La Marcha Negra fol- 
lows on the heels of three months of street demon- 
strations, strikes and protests organized by trade 
unions and a united front of the emerging popular 
movement. 

In the economically destabilized, polarized and 
repressive aftermath of the invasion, the bulk of 
Panama's 2.3 million citizens are hard-pressed to 
survive and to get themselves organized. As a Na- 
tional University professor explained to me during 
the Marcha, "This is the worst political and eco- 
nomic crisis in Panama's history." As Raul Leis put 
it in an op-ed piece in today's La Prensa, "Panama 
today is an occupied country, with a non-sovereign 
government engaged in implementing an unpopular 
undemocratic program of economic readjustment." 
According to Leis and other analysts, the pre- and 
post-invasion damages of U.S. low-intensity and 
(high-intensity) warfare amount to four billion dol- 
lars in losses for the Panamanian economy-a crip- 
pling sum for an underdeveloped and dependent 
country whose Gross National Product has fallen to 
approximately five billion dollars per year (the 
GNP has fallen 25% between 1987-90.) 

As La Marcha Negra continues its three mile 
procession toward the bombed-out ruins of El 
Chorrillo, a young woman in black jeans and shirt 
hands out a leaflet entitled "Fuera Tropas Yanquis 
de Panama" (Yankee Troops Get Out of Panama.) 
The leaflet summarizes the damages resulting from 
the war and the continuing occupation, and then 
catalogues some of the repressive measures taken 
by the Endara-Arias Calderon-Ford administration 
over the past twelve months, including mass police 
sweeps, searches and arrests in barrio districts by 
the Panamanian police and U.S. combat troops; the 
dislocation, razing and burning of squatter 
communities in Panama City, Colon and rural ar- 
eas; repression against high school and college stu- 
dents; massive dismissals and criminal charges di- 



rected against dissident government and private 
sector workers and the entire leadership of the trade 
union movement; and the violent suppression of 
street demonstrations here in the capital. 

In the Banana and Service Industry Republic 
of Panama, unemployment stands at 25 % of the to- 
tal workforce. Forty per cent of the country's fami- 
lies are living in poverty. Consumer prices are ris- 
ing; wages are being driven downwards; working 
conditions are deteriorating; crime and violence are 
increasing; and social services and benefits are be- 
ing reduced. Since the first of the year, 20,000 of 
the country's 150,000 public sector workers have 
been fired from their jobs; many, if not most, for 
political reasons, according to opposition 
spokespersons and the non-governmental National 
Commission on Human Rights In Panama 
(CONADEHUPA.) 

Another 90,000 private sector workers lost 
their jobs as a consequence of the U.S. economic 
blockade of 1987-89. In addition 40,000 citizens 
(unionists, students, journalists, intellectuals, citi- 
zen militia members, ex-military officials, etc.) are 
facing potential criminal charges in a government- 
inspired witch-hunt which has been characterized 
by CONADEHUPA as "judicial terror" -- all be- 
cause of trade union or grassroots work carried out 


SUMMER 1991 page 29 





during the Noriega era or for their armed or un- 
armed opposition to Operation Just Cause. 

Not only have Uncle Sam's subsidies been 
meagre and slow in arriving, but these "gifts" are 
being delivered with extortionist-style austerity 
strings attached, i.e. demands that the Endara- 
Calderon-Ford junta privatize and "rationalize” the 
economy. This shock therapy - currently in vogue 
from Mexico to Tierra del Fuego as well as in 
Panama-demands the firing of thousands of work- 
ers, sharp reductions in wages and benefits, the 
auctioning off of state-owned, trade-unionized sec- 
tors of the economy; the elimination of tariffs 
which have been used to raise government revenues 
and to protect Panamanian businesses from being 
swamped by the multinational corporations; and the 
implementation of higher prices and taxes for the 
consumers and lower-income majority. In short, 
Torrijos-era social democracy (or what was left of 
it after the Noriega debacle) is being eliminated in 
favour of the traditional Banana Republic model. 

Following a cruel and Machiavellian pattern of 
U.S. economic policy in the region, Panama's aid is 
expected to be cut back significantly in 1991-92. 
This will mean further belt-tightening for the grass- 
roots, but it will also mean higher profits for the 
multi-national corporations, who will be happy to 
take advantage of lower production costs and a 
weakened trade union opposition as they expand 


strategic markets and salvage, at rock-bottom 
prices, the profitable sectors of the economy. Be- 
sides bolstering the sagging profits of the multi-na- 
tional corporations, an ongoing IMF/AID program 
of institutionalized economic destabilization will 
undoubtedly provide a strong rationalization for a 
permanent military occupation to keep grassroots 
resistance under control, and a de facto, if not for- 
mally legal, control over the Canal Zone extending 
into the 21st century. 

As disgruntled Panamanians will tell you on 
the streets, the real reason that the Bush Gang car- 
ried out Just Cause was not to capture the CIA's 
erstwhile partner-in-crime and accomplice in dirty 
tricks, Manuel Noriega, but to destroy a potentially 
populist and nationalistic Panamanian Army and to 
abrogate the terms of the 1977 Torrijos-Carter 
Canal Treaty, which calls for Panama to control the 
Canal and for the closure of strategic U.S. military 
bases by the year 2000. 

In the realpolitik world of the 1990s, it is no 
longer necessary for the Washington-Tokyo-Berlin 
axis to make concessions to the Third World. 
Therefore, it is likely that the U.S. will do every- 
thing in its power to retain practical control over 
the Canal (even as Panamanian figureheads are 
placed in nominal authority), the military bases and 
the country itself as a 21st century neo-colony. As 
one of Bush's favourite strategic thinkers, Roger 
Fontaine, stated rather bluntly in February 1990: 
"with the abolition of the Armed Forces of Panama, 
the capacity of Panama to defend the Canal has 
been radically reduced, making it impossible to 
hand over the principle responsibilities (of running 
the Canal) at the beginning of the next century." 

Endara's policies and the continuing destabi- 
lization have fueled the anger of a militant and in- 
creasingly well -organized grassroots resistance, 
which has carried out a series of mass street 
marches with up to 50,000 participants between 
October and December, as well as a quite success- 
ful national strike on December 5. Whereas La 
Marcha Negra was committed to nonviolence, there 
is a genuine armed resistance developing in 
Panama. 

The real Resistance is definitely not pro-Nor- 
iega, who in the eyes of today's rebels never lifted 
a finger to help the poor, working class and 
campesino majority of Panama. Nor is it a Resis- 
tance which hopes to replace one section of the oli- 
garchy with another set of militarists. The real 
Resistance in occupied Panama today is pro-inter- 
nationalist, pro-grassroots, and conscious of the 
fact that building a mass based popular movement is 


page 30 KICK IT OVER #26 


and will be today's, next year's and the next 
decade's priority. 

Genuine acts of resistance and sabotage will 
be carried out, as opposed to Guerra Sucia's dirty 
tricks such as discotheque grenade attacks and spu- 
rious jailbreaks and police revolts. However, this 
Resistance will be subordinated to the building of a 
mass majority movement which is determined to 
implement the Torrijos-Carter treaty and take over 
the Canal, to close down the U.S. military bases, 
and to restructure the politics, economics and cul- 
ture of Panama. 


2. Costa Rica 

Cruising in a Budget rent-a-car, under a glit- 
tering canopy of stars, a stone's throw from the 
pounding surf along Costa Rican highway 36 be- 
tween the Panama border and the Caribbean port of 
Limon, the social and economic decomposition of 
Central America and the wars in El Salvador and 
Guatemala seem far away. But perhaps not that far 
away -- down the road there's an abrupt gash in the 
rainforest, the site of a CIA radio installation, radio 
impacto, which until recently beamed U.S. propa- 
ganda into Nicaragua and Panama. Now that pro- 
U.S. regimes have been installed on both sides of 
Costa Rica’s borders, the 24-hour-a-day armed 
guards have been relaxed, but the barbed wire fence 
and cinder-block sentry post, standing in front of 
three gigantic radio towers, are a graphic reminder 


that Costa Rica's bucolic social democracy and non- 
aligned foreign policy have become a thing of the 
past. 

Some of the highlights of the week in Costa 
Rica's rightwing dailies. La Nacion and La Repub- 
lica, include: the war in the Middle East and the 
steep rise in domestic gasoline and diesel prices; the 
IMF/AID-imposed consumer price hikes; more pro- 
posed cuts in social services; gunrunning and coke 
smuggling in Limon (carried out by a still-opera- 
tional Nicaraguan Contra network); and the erec- 
tion of a $20 million U.S. military radar station on 
the Nicoya Peninsula. The Tico Times, the liberal 
San Jose English language weekly, has recently 
been running feature stories on Costa Rica's ram- 
pant deforestation; pesticide contamination; eco- 
tourism; and the post-invasion situation in Panama - 
- this week covering the exhumation of a mass 
grave in Colon, filled with victims of the U.S. mil- 
itary intervention of last December. 

Last night, shortly after driving past a pesti- 
cide-reeking banana plantation, I was forced to stop 
by an armed Costa Rican Guardia who pointed his 
U.S. -supplied M-l carbine in my face and pawed 
through die van, ostensibly looking for contraband. 
His attitude and camouflage outfit were a drastic 
change from the polite demeanour and boy scout 
uniforms that I remembered the mostly unarmed 
Tico police wearing during the reign of Oscar Arias 
(1985-90.) But this is the new White House-tailored 
Costa Rica, I told myself, fired up to fight the war 
on drugs and subversion, and determined to elimi- 



SUMMER 1991 page 31 


nate the "creeping socialism" of public welfare, 
consumer subsidies, and government control over 
banks, insurance companies, and utilities. In the 
post-Esquipulas, International Monetary Fund ad- 
ministration of President Rafael Angel Calderon, 
what really matters are U.S. transnational profits, 
government austerity, regional security (no more 
leftwing revolutions), and timely debt payments to 
the international bankers— not Nobel Peace Prizes. 

I relaxed a little as he asked me in slurred, 
drunken Spanish "Tiene usted una grabadora?" (do 
you have a tape 
recorder?" I realized that 
he was looking more for 
a bribe than for a 
surface-to-air missile. If 
this had been one of the 
more repressive 

neighbouring banana 
republics, it would not 
have been that 
humourous. Still, for a 
country that supposedly 
abolished its army 40 
years ago, there seem to 
be a lot of guns and 
security forces around. 

According to the 
leftwing weekly 

Adelante, the tourist 
paradise of Costa Rica 
(population three mil- 
lion) now has 25,000 
police and Guardia, 
counting the reserves and 
police auxiliary, with 
U.S. -prompted security 
expenditures increasing 
30% in two years. These 
unnecessary and in fact 
unpopular increases in 
military spending are 
especially irrational, 
given the fact that the country is essentially 
bankrupt, with the highest per capita debt in all of 
Central America. Meanwhile consumer prices, as in 
all of Latin America, have risen sharply, while 
social services are being cut back or privatized, 
leading some analysts to predict that Costa Rica 
will soon be experiencing mass political protests, 
like its neighbours. A number of unions have 
recently gone on strike to protest the drastic price 
increases in public services, transportation, and 
foodstuffs, while leftwing intellectuals have loudly 


complained about Costa Rica's transformation into 
just another U.S. client state. 

Lately, it seems like negotiations have been in 
the news a lot -- between government officials and 
left-wing opposition movements in El Salvador, 
Guatemala, and Nicaragua -- as well as negotiations 
here between the international bankers and the 
Costa Rican government. Today's news focuses on 
the latest maneuvers between Calderon administra- 
tion officials and the U.S. AID debt collectors, who 
are demanding that Costa Rica step up the required 

economic shock 

treatments that are being 
applied throughout Latin 
America. While already 
pauperized citizens have 
been sacking stores and 
supermarkets in the 
Dominican Republic, 
Venezuela and Peru, and 
setting up street 
barricades in Managua, 
here people on the street 
are not doing much more 
than just complaining -- 
at least for the moment 


3. Nicaragua 

In Nicaragua, the 
Chamorro/UNO junta 
has been coerced into 
negotiations (although 
each time breaking 
government promises as 
soon as the strikes and 
negotiations end,) and in 
fact, has been forced to 
accept a form of co- 
governance, not because 
the Somocistas and the 
rightwing have mellowed 
out, but because the Sandinista grassroots 
opposition is the strongest force in the country. As 
Daniel Ortega promised, the Sandinista rank-and- 
file may have lost the U.S. -sabotaged February 25 
elections, but they are continuing the process of 
participatory democracy, "governing from below.". 

As recent events illustrate, if Chamorro's cir- 
cle refuses to negotiate, or goes too far with their 
IMF-prescribed shock therapy, they'll be over- 
thrown by the highly politicized and armed 
Nicaraguan majority (those 41% who voted Sandin- 



page32 KICK IT OVER #26 


ista or those who would have preferred to vote San- 
dinista but voted for UNO on pragmatic grounds.) 
As the neo-liberal shock therapy of the Chamorro 
administration literally threatens to destroy the 

livelihood of the Nicaraguan working class 
and the poor, the Bush administration has offered 
very little in the way of economic relief, leading 
some analysts to speculate that Washington would 
welcome a civil war in the belief that this would 
lead to the final destruction of the Sandinistas. 

During the July national strike, when heavily 
armed Contra militiamen shot it out with Sandinista 
strikers in the streets of Managua, Bush did offer 
his "help" -- in the form of a U.S. invasion force to 
crush the FSLN. Chamorro and her advisors wisely 
declined. 

Even with the ending of the Contra war and 
the carrying out of two semi-victorious national 
strikes and largescale grassroots mobilization, 
things are not improving for the Sandinista rank- 
and-file nor for the overwhelming majority of the 
population. Prices have skyrocketed, unemploy- 
ment has climbed to over 40%, social services have 
deteriorated, and the 
crime rate has soared. 

Chamorero and the UNO 
gang are willing to nego- 
tiate when necessary, but 
they are also doing ev- 
erything in their power 
to destroy the gains of 
the Sandinista 

Revolution -- cutting off 
funds and jobs in all 
those areas where the 
Sandinista unions, co- 
operatives, and 

grassroots organizations 
are strong; allowing the 
"demobilized" Contra 
army to seize land, rustle 
cattle, form rural zones 
of control, and establish 
urban strikebreaking militias; and re-privatizing the 
land and the economy. But Chamorro's attempts to 
reverse Sandinismo are having mixed results. The 
majority of the Nicaraguan people are aroused and 
organized, Sandinista cadres have begun analyzing 
and correcting their past mistakes, and the popular 
movement is digging in for what promises to be a 
tough and protracted struggle. 

Many of those who voted for UNO now say 
that they regret having swapped principle (their 
support for the revolution) for pragmatism (their 



desire to end the Contra war and their belief that 
the economy would improve.) If there were an 
election or an armed uprising tomorrow, the San- 
dinistas would have the overwhelming support of 
the army, the police, the trade unions, and the peo- 
ple in general — 80% of whom, according the re- 
cent statistics, are living in conditions of poverty. 
But the overthrow of the Chamorro/UNO junta 
would undoubtedly be a bloody process, and the 
U.S. and its surrogate armies in Central America 
would probably intervene. So, for the moment at 
least, the Sandinista grassroots have decided to try 
to co-govern with the Chamorro gang, rather than 
overthrow them. 

But peace and prosperity seem as far away as 
ever. A number of articulate Nicaraguans have ex- 
pressed to me this year the belief that they do not 
expect to eventually gain their definitive liberation, 
but perhaps only at the same time that their Sal- 
vadoran and Guatemalan companeros do. In the 
Brave New World of the 1990s, no individual coun- 
try is likely to be allowed to gain its independence 
from Big Brother and to chart an independent or al- 
ternative path. What 
Central Americans and 
Latinos in general are 
facing is nothing less 
than a hemispheric 
crisis, for which the only 
possible solution is a 
regionalized solidarity 
and a regionalized resis- 
tance. Unfortunately, 
this adds up to a very 
long struggle, and many 
of the people on the 
bottom are already war- 
weary. 


4. Guatemala 


Staring out of a 
slightly cracked and dirty window on the Galgos 
(Greyhound) bus, I am fascinated by the scenery 
and activity along the roadside. The 1990 sugar 
cane harvest is in full swing on the agro-export 
plantations of Guatemala's Pacific coast, and the 
lush fields are filled with canecutters. According to 
economic projections, this will be the longest and 
most profitable sugar cane harvest in the country's 
history. Across the aisle from me, an old lady, 
wearing rubber sandals and a tattered dress, is re- 
fusing to pay the recently increased ticket price of 


SUMMER 1991 page 33 



four quetzales (one dollar U.S.), insisting to the 
rude and threatening conductor that she has only 
three and a half quetzales. Yesterday, in Guatemala 
City, high school students built barricades and 
blocked streets in protest against the rise in bus 
fares. 

As we roar past a campesina woman and her 
young, barefoot daughter on the side of the high- 
way, both staggering under heavy loads of firewood 
strapped to their backs, I am reminded of the in- 
credible greed and ruthlessness of the economic 
elite who run this country -- the 2% of the 
agribusiness operators who control 72% of the na- 
tion's arable land. It makes me angry to think about 
how the Ladino landed gentry are able to get away 
with paying 19th century wages -- between 64 cents 
and $1.45 per day - for 10-12 hours of backbreak- 
ing field work. Among the strawhatted, sweating 
canecutters, swinging their machetes, there are 
children who look no more than six years old. The 
indigenous and rural people call their child labour- 
ers hombrecitos and mujercilas (little men and 
wimmin), and many a family would literally starve 
to death if their children were in school instead of 
working alongside them in the fields. 

Of course, in the light of the 147,000 assassi- 
nations and disappearances carried out by plantation 
gunmen and government security forces since the 
U.S. -inspired military coup of 1954, one has to 
think twice before insisting to one's patron that he 
raise one's wages, or repair the stinking galera one 
sleeps in, or provide potable drinking water so that 
one's family does not die from intestinal parasites. 
And yet, several weeks ago, 60,000 jxnca workers 
were brave enough to go on strike in the adjoining 
departments of Retalhuleu, Suchitepequez, and Es- 
cuintla, demanding better wages and working 
conditions. As usual, the plantation owners called 


out the military and threatened to fire everyone, 
while the so-called "fledgling democracy" of Presi- 
dent Vinicio Cerezo cynically promised to facilitate 
negotiations between the patrones and the 
fieldworkers' union (the semi-clandestine 
Campesino Unity Committee CUC, which in turn is 
part of the larger united front, Trade Union and 
Popular Action coalition, UASP.) Eight weeks 
later, nothing has come of these negotiations. A 
similar strike took place in January of last year, 
with similar results. 

In the short distance between the Mexican bor- 
der and Malacatan, we have already been stopped 
and searched four times -- twice by the Treasury 
Police, once by the National Police, and now by the 
military. The bus driver tells me that they're look- 
ing for drugs. But, when I discretely ask the young 
woman in a blue school uniform sitting next to me 
if this many registros are common in San Marcos, 
she leans over and half whispers that the army is 
looking for the guerrillas, who have been stopping 
vehicles on the highway and collecting "war taxes", 
as well as invading the larger fincas up and down 
the coast. 

According to Guatemalan news sources, in 
1989 the country's leftwing guerillas, the URNG 
(National Revolutionary Unity of Guatemala), set 
up blockades of roadways 187 times, temporarily 
occupied 11 municipal or county centres, and in- 
vaded 167 villages and fincas. As a Cakchikel In- 
dian migrant labourer in Solola later explains, many 
of the large landowners in Guatemala are being 
forced to pay higher wages on their fincas after 
these invasions by the URNG -- who typically 
threaten to burn down the patrones' buildings or 
seize their crops if they continue to abuse their 
workers. In retaliation, hired hitmen and soldiers 
have launched a murderous wave of repression, 
singling out campesino and indigenous activists for 
assassination. 

Today's newspaper reports that six dead bod- 
ies have been discovered in the agro-export Pacific 
region in the last 24 hours ~ all bearing the typical 
marks of deathsquad-style executions. As a Na- 
tional Police officer admitted to me last year in the 
conflict-ridden zone of Santiago Atitlan, these types 
of assassinations are never investigated. Whenever 
there are obvious signs of death squad operations, 
i.e. groups of assailants or kidnappers with military 
type uniforms or weapons, vehicles with polarized 
windshields and license plates removed, corpses 
with multiple wounds or evidence of torture or mu- 
tilation, etc., law enforcement and judicial authori- 
ties never get involved, lest they themselves be- 


page34 KICK IT OVER #26 


come the next victims. At the end of March, the 
department of San Marcos records yet another In- 
dian massacre, as five indigenous wimmin are kid- 
napped, mutilated and murdered. 

As we approach a heavily guarded bridge just 
outside Coatepeque, I notice that a number of sol- 
diers and pedestrians are leaning over the railing, 
looking down into the river. "Un muerto," (a dead 
body,) the driver says nonchalantly, as he stops the 
bus to let a green-uniformed Treasury policeman 
climb on board. 

Several hours later, we are slowed to a halt by 
the largest traffic jam I've ever seen in Central 
America. Cars, buses and trucks, many loaded 
down with the cotton and sugar cane harvest, are 
backed up for miles on both sides of the Coyolate 
River bridge, destroyed in a spectacular sabotage 
action by URNG guerrillas last December. The 
bridge is a strategic artery for passenger and crop 
transportation in the Pacific region, and its destruc- 
tion by the UMBRA is a potent reminder that the 
Guatemalan resistance has expanded from its tra- 
dional zones of operations in the highlands and jun- 
gles into the economic 
heartland of the 
country. Instead of the 
normal traffic flow, we 
are forced to drive, one 
vehicle at a time, over a 
U.S. military supplied 
"Bailey" bridge, with 
the massive, twisted 
steel and concrete of the 
old bridge structure 
lying in the river gorge 
below. On part of the 
destroyed bridge, 
hanging over the 
precipice, the army has 
neatly spray-painted a 
propaganda message: 

"A Gift from the URNG 
to the Very Noble Peo- 
ple of Guatemala." 

As I watch the 
sunset from a park 
bench in the picturesque 
town plaza of Antigua, 
five personnel carriers. 

Armadillos, rumble 
through the cobblestone 
streets. Recent fighting, 
artillery fire, and aerial 
bombing in the nearby 


villages of Santa Maria de Jesus and Magdalena 
Milpas Altas have alarmed the residents of this 
popular tourist spot, located 45 km. west of the 
capital city. According to local military sources, 
there's a fear that the URNG may be planning to 
disrupt Antigua's Easter Week celebrations this 
year, when thousands of foreign visitors and upper 
class Guatemalans converge on the city. 

Since the powerful Salvadoran FMLN guer- 
rilla offensive of November 1989, the U.S. inva- 
sion of Panama the next month, and the February 
25 1990 Nicaraguan elections, more and more 
opposition activists in Guatemala seem to agree that 
only a regional resistance campaign, coupled with 
internal changes in the USA, will bring about a 
negotiated, socially just solution to the generalized 
crisis of the region. Thousands of highly politicized 
Salvadorans have taken temporary refuge in 
Guatemala over the last few months, and their in- 
teractions with the aboveground and clandestine re- 
sistance here seem to have had a beneficial effect on 
the overall morale of the movement. 

If the Salvadorans can eventually defeat their 
death squad democracy, 
so can the Guatemalans. 
Unfortunately, the Bush 
administration can be 
expected to try to crush 
any future leftwing 
revolution in the 
hemisphere, as the 
recent Nicaraguan 
experience shows. As 
an activist in the 
countryside recently 
explained to me, 
Guatemala and the 
countries of Latin 
America will eventually 
gain their liberation -- 
but more as a bloc, 
rather than individually 
-- and in the meantime, 
it's going to be a long, 
bloody struggle. For the 
moment, things are 
worse than ever in 
Guatemala and Central 
America, but the signs 
of grassroots rebellion 
and resistance appear to 
be growing. 



SUMMER 1991 page 35 


SLIDEBANK FOR SOCIAL ACTIVISTS 


Have you run out of friends and relatives to 
show your slides to and now those slides sit on a 
closet shelf - unorganized, unused, unseen, unap- 
preciated? Well, that was the beginning of an idea 
that culminated in the founding of the Kai Slide 
Bank, a slide collection for social change activists 
in helping to make slide show documentaries. Ma- 
jor categories include Pollution, Sexism, Violence, 
Racism, Transportation, Health, Class, Economics, 
and Native Peoples, in addition to Children, 
Women, Men, Animals, Birds, Graphics, Energy, 
Industry and Peace. 

But why start such a slide bank? Because in 
major cities commercial slide banks in North Amer- 
ica start with fees of $70.00 per slide! So Kai Slide 
Bank was established seven years ago with the 
collections of its founding members, and was in- 
corporated as a 
non-profit group 
with fees as near 
to cost as 
possible (as long 
as showings are 
non-commercial 
and no one is 
making money 
from the final 
product. In those 
cases, a sliding 
scale is used). 

As word 
spread, people 
with under-used 
slides gathering 
dust were 

encouraged to 
bring them out of 
those closets and 
to place them in 
the collection, so 
that now there 
are nearly 15,000 
slides available, 
and one feature of the collection is worth noting: 
the photographers continue to own their pictures, 
not Kai Slide Bank. The slide bank only wishes 
access to the slides, not to own them, and so asks 
photographers to leave them on file for a minimum 
of five years in order to guarantee maximum circu- 
lation. (In the unlikely event that Kai Slide Bank 



should ever fold, the slides would continue to be 
the property of the photographer and not of the 
slide bank.) 

The individuals and groups that have used the 
collection to date are many and varied: Black The- 
atre Canada, Medical Aid to Nicaragua, the Ba- 
hai Peace Project, CUSO, the Coalition for Les- 
bian and Gay rights in Ontario, OPIRG, the Na- 
tive Canadian Centre, and Pollution Probe among 
scores of others. The documentaries these groups 
and individuals have made include such issues as 
uranium mining, anti-racism work, women's issues, 
homophobia, alternate schools, patient-oriented 
health clinics and class issues. And the slide bank 
itself has made an introductory slide show on how 
to make effective slide shows, complete with 140 
slides, audio cassette and a copy of the script. Its 

title: How to 

Make a Slide 
Show for Social 
Change. Kai 
Slide Bank sells 
this kit at cost, 
$190.00 Cdn. 
Running time is 
thirty-four 
minutes. 

If, then, you 
are a picture 
taker who'd like 
to see your slides 
used in a positive 
way, get in touch 
with the Slide 
Bank. They are 
looking for well- 
exposed, in-focus 
slides (not prints) 
that might relate 
to any of their 
major categories. 
Content is as 
important as 
beauty; they need slum shots as much as palm trees. 
And what's in it for you? Recognition by way of 
photo credits where possible, and the satisfaction of 
seeing your slides put to good use. And knowing 
that, instead of owning slides that are fading on a 
shelf, your pictures are being stored under archival 


SUMMER 1991 page 36 


conditions (temperature/light controlled) and that 
you still have access to them. 

The name of this unique group, Kai Slide 
Bank honours Kai Yutah Clouds, one of their co- 
workers and a long time activist in Native issues. 
When Kai discovered that the toxic chemicals DDT 
and Aldrin were being shipped by US charities like 
Oxfam to Guatemalan Native peoples following the 
1976 earthquake (both chemicals are banned in 
North America) he returned to that region to try to 
undo some of the damage multinationals were in- 
flicting there for reasons of their own profit. Unfor- 
tunately, the Guatemalan government discovered 
his work by a mistake made when friends in 
Toronto publicized his work without his permis- 
sion. Within weeks he was seized and tortured to 
death. 

For more information or details on Kai Slide 
Bank, write to 

Kai Slide Bank 
P O Box 5490, Station A 
Toronto, Ontario Canada M5W 1N7 
Telephone: (416) 964-1278 



" So Karl , you think that the 
parliamentary road will lead 
to social revolution, eh ? " 


SMASHING THE IRON RICEPOT 


Smashing the Iron Rice Pot 
by Leung-Wing-yue 

Published by Asia Labour Monitor @ 1988 
Reviewed by Bruce Allen 

Last year's events in China at first amazed and 
then outraged people around the world. Almost no 
one anticipated them and few seemed to grasp their 
meaning. Unfortunately, labour organizations 
proved to be no different in this respect and, conse- 
quently, were nowhere to be seen during the 
protests following the Beijing Massacre. 

Labour organizations should have been promi- 
nent in the outcry. A strong working class presence 
would have demonstrated a real commitment to the 
defense of basic democratic rights. It would also 
have enabled us to stress that workers comprise a 
mighty force within China's democratic movement, 
and how worker involvement in last year’s events 
gave birth to an independent Chinese labour move- 
ment. In addition, such working class participation 
in the protests would have been a timely show of 
solidarity with workers in a country striving to be- 
come a real force in the world economy. 


Asia Labour Monitor's recently released book 
Smashing the Iron Rice Pot is indispensable both 
to grasping this latter development and seeing the 
related need for an independent Chinese labour 



SUMMER 1991 page 37 


movement. This new work also helps us to see why 
so many Chinese workers made common cause with 
the students and why it is in international labour's 
interest to support the struggles of both groups. 

"'lOe can- only begin- to tacQCe- the 

concrete- and barbed- wire 
that divides our world- 
when- we start toiih that 
on our cion- doorstep V 



The two main concerns addressed in Smash- 
ing the Iron Rice Pot are labour organization in 
China and the impact of recent Chinese economic 
reforms on workers. The book's author clearly 
shows that the existing trade unions in China are ef- 
fectively subordinate to the ruling Chinese Com- 
munist Party. He also shows that, despite this, 
these unions have exerted some organizational au- 
tonomy, with the degree varying according to 
changes in the ruling party's leadership and corre- 
sponding shifts in the Chinese government’s indus- 
trial strategy. 

The author likewise reveals that the economic 
reforms of the last decade were imposed from 
above without much input from the trade unions, 
and with mainly negative effects on workers. These 
reforms, we are told, set China's economy on a 
new course marked by an opening to investment 
from other Pacific Rim countries and the west. 
They included measures to reduce central planning 
of the economy, enhance the power of enterprise 
managers and to create Special Economic Zones 
where foreign transnationals enjoy unprecedented 


opportunities to exploit China's vast underpaid 
work force. 

Due to the reforms, the real incomes of many 
workers have risen. But, according to the author, 
the changes have also led to widespread unemploy- 
ment, worsening industrial safety standards, weak- 
ened social security, widespread forced overtime 
and even the removal of the right to strike from 
China's constitution. 

The author maintains that the transnationals 
applied much of the pressure for these anti-worker 
reforms. Their implementation showed that China's 
rulers are quite willing to slash labour costs to at- 
tract foreign currency and technology. 

The author also stresses that due to the re- 
forms China now offers transnational corporations 
the cheapest labour force in Asia. He further notes 
that this has even led to situations where corpora- 
tions located in countries like the Philippines have 
responded to union activity with threats to shut 
plants down and move them to China. 

The picture presented is not entirely bleak, 
however. The reader is given ample information 
concerning worker resistance, and it is noted that 
the Special Economic Zones are particularly prone 
to strikes. Most significantly, the author notes how 
the wave of student protests affecting ten cities in 
December 1986 was accompanied by worker un- 
rest, including strikes, that alarmed China's rulers. 
This reveals that the 1989 Beijing Spring was but 
the most recent and spectacular chapter in an on- 
going struggle for democratic change. 

In view of this and the worsening abuse of 
China's workers rooted in the drive to integrate 
China into a world economy dominated by a few 
hundred corporations, the need for working class 
militants in all countries to take a serious interest in 
the struggles of China's workers should be obvious. 
So should the need to take a serious look at this in- 
valuable and insightful work. 

Bruce Allen is an activist in CAW Local 199 and 
the author of Germany East: Dissent and Opposi- 
tion, published by Black Rose Books. 





page 38 KICK IT OVER #26 


THE GLOBAL VILLAGE 


Tribes Forcibly Moved 

INDONESIA: An earthquake which killed over 100 
people in August 1989 has been used by the In- 
donesian government as an excuse for the forcible 
removal of the Hupla tribal people, who were trans- 
ferred to a lowland site under the pretext of provid- 
ing them with geologically stable land. The Hupla 
were told that they would receive no further emer- 
gency aid if they did not leave their lands, which 
are believed to be rich in mineral resources. 

The land on which they were settled, at Ele- 
lim, is already owned by another tribe and infested 
with tropical diseases, to which the highland Hupla 
have no resistance. Within the first few months of 
the program, 15 of them died of malaria or malnu- 
trition. Over $125,000 worth of aid sent to the Hu- 
pla by other countries and the Indonesian people 
was seized by Indonesia, and some of it was used to 
fund the coercive resettlement program. Only the 
donations channelled through church organizations 
reached the people. The forcible resettlement is part 
of a plan by Indonesia to move tens of thousands of 
tribespeople out of the resource-rich Baliem Gorge 
region so that the state can seize the resources and 
the people can be coerced into "civilizing." 
from: Survival Bulletin, 

October, 1990. 


Major Polluters Listed 

NEW YORK: The Earth Day Wall Street Action 
Handbook recently listed the fifteen top corporate 
contributors to global pollution, based on 1987 fig- 
ures and identifying only major pollutants, as be- 
ing: 

DuPont -- firearms, ammunition, polyester 
and acrylic fibers. Income: $33.3 billion; outgo: 
223.3 million pounds of chlorobenzene. 

Royal Dutch Shell - gas and oil, Dieldrin pes- 
ticide. Income: ?; outgo: 211.1 million pounds of 
acids and petrochemical pollution. 

British Petroleum -- polyethylene, Purina pet 
foods. Income: $1.2 billion; outgo: 197.2 million 
pounds of petrochemical pollution. 

American Cyanamide - Old Spice, Pine-Sol, 
Roach Control. Income: $305 million; outgo: 120.3 
pounds of acids and solvents. 


Occidental Petroleum -- oil, IBP beef and 
pork. Income: $302 million; outgo: 114.6 pounds 
of chlorine and solvents. 

Agrico Chemical Company -- fiber optics. In- 
come: $98 million; outgo: 100.9 pounds of acids. 

ASARCO -- silver, lead, zinc, asbestos min- 
ing. Income: $207 million; outgo; 95.2 pounds of 
heavy metals. 

EXXON — gasoline, coal mining, nuclear fuel 
fabrication. Income: $76.4 billion; outgo: 85.1 mil- 
lion pounds of petrochemicals and oil spills. 

Inland Steel -- steel, iron, limestone. Income: 
$262 million; outgo: 81.5 million pounds of toxic 
metals. 

Monsanto — Nutra Sweet, polystyrene, 
Roundup, Bovine Growth hormone. Income: $591 
million; outgo: 75.8 pounds of metals, dioxin, 
PCBs. 

Eastman Kodak -- film, paper, chemicals. In- 
come: $17 billion; outgo: 75.8 million pounds of 
chlorinated solvents. 

Vulcan Chemicals — dry cleaning chemicals. 
Income: ?; outgo: 73.4 million pounds of pen- 
tachlorophenol, solvents and phosgene gas. 

Dow Chemicals -- Saran Wrap, Cepacol, 
Spray'n’Wash, napalm. Income: $16.6 billion; 
outgo: 23.3 million pounds of petrochemicals. 

Urban Carbide -- chemicals, carbon, plastics, 
industrial gases. Income: $11.9 billion; outgo: 23.5 



SUMMER 1991 page 39 


million pounds of petrochemicals. 

Pfizer Pharmaceuticals -- Coty products, re- 
combinant DNA research. Income: ~$5.4 billion; 
outgo: 11,200,000 pounds of metals, 
from: Earth Day Wall Street Action Handbook, 
P.O. Box 1128, Old Chelsea Stn, 

New York, NY, 

USA 10011. 

Who Owns What 

USA: Here are some statistics about the USA com- 
piled by Labour Research Association/Z Magazine: 
total household wealth owned by top 1 % of popula- 
tion: 34%. 

total household wealth owned by bottom 80%: 
18.5% 

total household wealth owned by bottom 40%: 
0 . 8 % 

total financial wealth owned by top 1%: 48% 
total financial wealth owned by bottom 80%: 6% 
total financial wealth owned by bottom 60%: 0.7% 
value of outstanding stock shares owned by top 1 % : 
90% 

ratio of average corporate executive's salary to that 
of a blue-collar worker in 1980: 25 to 1 . 
ratio today: 90 to 1. 

number of billionaires in America in 1978: 1. 
number today: 99. 

number of millionaires in America in 1978: 
450,000. 

number today: 2 million. 

income ratio of the top 20% of Americans to the 
bottom 20%: 12 to 1. 

same ratio in West Germany: 5 to 1. in Japan: 4 to 

1 . 

percentage of U.S. federal government's debt 
owned by top 10%: 80. 

amount taxpayers paid in interest on federal debt 
since 1981: $1.3 trillion, 
from: The Portland Alliance v.ll, n.3 
2807 S.E. Stark, 

Portland, Oregon, 

USA 97214. (subs $15 U.S.) 


Moratorium a Sham 

PAPUA NEW GUINEA: The two-year moratorium 
on the issuance of new timber permits here, an- 
nounced last April in an attempt to rectify gross 
disregard of environmental regulations and illegal 
issuance of timber permits, was applauded by the 
international community but now appears to have 





•*7 


been a farce. So many exemptions were allowed to 
create new timber rights purchases that the morato- 
rium was effectively gutted. In Madang province, 
for instance, roughly one third of the remaining for- 
est is now covered by new permits, with no 
landowner associations established to approve 
them. One company that has been indicted for ille- 
gal timber practices has been given permission to 
continue operating under a new name. Those con- 
cerned should write: Karl Stack, Minister of 
Forests, Department of Forests, P.O. Box 5055, 
Boroko, Papua New Guinea. 

Rainforest Action Network 
301 Broadway, suite A, 

San Francisco, CA 
USA 94133. 

(to subscribe, donate $15-$100 U.S.) 


Blood For Oil in Ecuador 

ECUADOR-Among examples of the rape of the 
Ecuadorian Amazon by American oil companies: 


page 40 KICK IT OVER 426 


-Texaco has spilled an estimated 17 million gallons 
of oil, and plans to abandon the area where this has 
happened without cleaning it up. 

-Conoco (a subsidiary of DuPont) is developing an 
oil project that, by the end of the century, will 
obliterate the culture of an entire people, the Huao- 
rani. 

-ARCO is developing nearly half a million acres of 
untouched rainforest for oil production; it has al- 
ready cleared over two thousand acres, destroying 
many purinas (agricultural subsistence lands) de- 
veloped by the natives. Water pollution caused by 
inadequate waste treatment at oil camps has led to 
skin and stomach disease among the natives, who 
are being "pacified" by the Ecuadorian military and 
American evangelical missionaries. 

The Ecuadorian Amazon is home to an estimated 
ten per cent of all species on earth. Protest letters 
may be written to: 

Lodwrick M. Cook, 

Chief Executive Officer, 

ARCO, 

515 Flower Street, 

Los Angeles, CA 
USA 90071. 

Rainforest Action Network, 

March, 1991 Bulletin, 

301 Broadway, Suite A, 

San Francisco, CA, 

USA 94133. 



World Bank Destroys Rainforest 

Since the early 1980s, the World Bank has spon- 
sored the disastrous Polonoroeste "development" 
project in the Amazonian rainforest in northwestern 
Brazil, loaning $500 million to build a 1000-mile 
road through rainforests in the states of Rondonia 


and Mato Grosso. Encouraged by their govern- 
ment, over a million landless poor from other parts 
of the country have migrated to the region to estab- 
lish farms. They clear forest, destroying most of 
the fragile soil in the process, and so are only able 
to grow crops for a few seasons. As crops fail, set- 
tlers move on to clear new land, further deforesting 
the Amazon. Mining activities have further de- 
graded rainforest ecosystems, causing toxic mer- 
cury contamination in the entire food chain along 
the Madeira River. Denied even the most basic 
health services, the Indians face extinction from 
disease. 

Having failed to live up to its previous 
promises to protect certain areas from being cut 
down, Brazil is now seeking an additional $167 mil- 
lion from the World Bank to "protect" the remain- 
ing areas from deforestation. Until it does begin 
living up to past agreements, Brazil should be de- 
nied this loan. 

Canada contributes over $300 million a year 
to the World Bank, and Canadians are asked to 
write urging this policy to their MP, to the federal 
finance minister, and to Frank Potter, Executive 
Director for Canada, World Bank, 1818 H Street 
NW, Washington DC USA 20433. For more 
information: 

Friends of the Rainforest 
Box 4612, Station E, 

Ottawa Canada 
K1S 5H8. 



SUMMER 1991 page 41 



In Brief 


Help Eastern Bloc 

• Adopt- A-Group is proposing a direct group- 
to-group contact and exchange between anarchist 
groups in eastern and central Europe with those in 
the west. Isolated by decades of Stalinist repression 
and isolation, the eastern groups have had access to 
few anarchist books, pamphlets, magazine subscrip- 
tions, fliers of local activities, cassettes and other 
resources. Instead of each western group trying to 
inform all the eastern groups, this project proposes 
that each group here focus on one groups there and 
send them whatever materials they request. The 
western group could organize benefits to give fi- 
nancial assistance to its adopted group. 

Anarchist groups wishing to be networked in 
this manner should contact: 

Stephen Dankowich 

ACT for Disarmament (Toronto) 

225 Brunswick A v en u 

Toronto, Canada jnKtUHttlBgt 

M5S 2M6. flHH 


Anarchist Research Centre 

LAUSANNE: The library of the International 
Centre for Research on Anarchism (CIRA) is open 
at its new premises. Services such as loans, bio- 
graphical information, etc. are available for all 


readers having paid the annual subscription fee 
(Sw. fr. 40, or the equivalent of approximately US 
$25, UK 15 pounds.) Consultation is also possible 
by correspondence; books are loaned abroad; pho- 
tocopies of publications and articles can be pro- 
vided; a twice-yearly bulletin is published. 

The library will be open every weekday from 
4 to 7 p.m., or by appointment. 

CIRA 

Avenue de Beaumont 24 
CH-1012 

Lausanne, Switzerland 

Tel. (021) 32 48 19 or 32 35 43 

Smoke Detectors Dangerous 

McCALL, IDAHO: Researcher Craig Wasson re- 
ports that there's at least a 95% chance that the 
smoke detector in your home contains extremely 
dangerous radioactive material. The name of this 
material is Americium 241, the radioactive by- 
product of depleted Plutonium 239 (nuclear waste.) 

At one time, smoke detectors used photoelec- 
tric cell detectors, in which harmless visible light 
was deflected by smoke particles to a photo-cell in 
order to trigger its alarm. Now, however, the alarm 
is triggered by Americium 241. According to Dr. 
Edward A. Martell, an environmental radiochemist 
with the National Centre for Atmospheric Research 
in Boulder, Colorado, "there are thousands of lethal 
doses in one microcurie of Americium 241.” 

Why the change? Many states that had once 
allowed nuclear waste to be dumped in their soil, 
accepting the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 
(NRC) assurances of safety, had changed their 
minds about both the waste and the Commission, 
and didn't want any more of either. Faced with the 
problem of what to do with the nuclear waste that 
was accumulating at a staggering rate at all nuclear 
reactor sites, the NRC decided that smoke detectors 
would be a good place for it. 

The NRC has licensed and promoted the legal 
and moral transfer of an unbelievably toxic ra- 
dioactive waste, which will remain dangerously 
toxic and carcinogenic for thousands of years, by 
selling it to householders under the guise of pro- 
tecting themselves and their families from fire. 
These appointed bureaucrats have consistently over- 



pay 42 KICK IT OVER §26 


ridden such elected politicians as have tried to stop 
this procedure. (From the author's research paper.) 


Human Economy Network 

The Human Economy Network is facilitating 
communication between persons who wish to con- 
tribute to the development of alternative economics. 
Its goals include: 

Assisting the work of existing organizations which 
share similar concerns (including The Other 
Economic Summit TOES, the Society for a 
Human Economy, The Living Economy Net- 
work/U.K., and the Society for the Advance- 
ment of Socio-Economics, among others.) 
Attracting new people to ’ 
this network, and 
introducing them to 
these organizations. 

Identifying the interests 
of network 

participants, and 
putting those with 
similar concerns in 
contact with each 
other. 

Facilitating dialogues 
among participants, 
through both a 
newsletter and 
easy-to-use 
computer linkages. 

To join the 
network, one need only 
fill in a questionnaire 
identifying specific 
area(s) of interest in economics, for the purpose ot 
preparing a directory of participants grouped by 
common concerns. 

Present communications arrangements include: 

1. The "Networking Column" of the Human 
Economy Newsletter, a quarterly publication of the 
Society for a Human Economy at Mankato State 
University. Sample copies can be obtained by 
writing directly to the Society at Box 14, 
Department of Economics, Mankato State 
University, Mankato, MN USA 56001. 

2. Computer conferences, via BITNET and 
other electronic networks. The BITNET/CERN 
system presently links over 3,000 academic 
institutions worldwide, and provides access to 
various electronic bulletin boards including 
ECONET, PEACENET and GREENET. 


STARVATION IS GOD'S 
WAY OF PUNISHING 
THOSE WHO HAVE 
LITTLE OR NO FAITH 
IN CAPITALISM... 



For further information: 
Professor Don Cole 
Human Economy Network 
c/o Economics Department 
Drew University 
Madison, New Jersey 
USA 07940. 


Pagan Resources Directory 

The Directory of Canadian Pagan Resources is 
the only comprehensive directory of resources for 
Witches, Dianics, Faeries, neo-Pagans, Druids, and 
others spiritually attuned to Nature and the Goddess 
and Old Gods in Canada . It lists, free of charge, 

newsletters, gatherings, 
bookstores, covens and 
individuals (with written 
permission), and other 
resources in the 
community. The 1990 
Directory (#3) was 
issued May, 1990 and 
costs $3. Information or 
copies: 

Sam Wagar 

Obscure Pagan 

Press/Pagans for Peace 
P.O. Box. 86134, 

North Vancouver, B.C. 
Canada V7L 2L9. 


Political Prisoners 
Documented 


Free copies of the book The Dark Side of Eu- 
rope, listing more than 100,000 political prisoners, 
have been sent to political prisoners and anti-re- 
pressive organizations in Europe and America. Sale 
price is 700 ptes (Spanish,) including postal expen- 
ditures. For orders: 

Dark Side of Europe 
Aptat. no 2.192 
Barcelona 08080 
Spain. 


Anarchist Literature 

For a full range of anarchist books, periodi- 
cals and pamphlets, including the hard-to-get, small 


SUMMER 1991 page 43 



press stuff, send a few bucks (preferably in interna- 
tional money order, English pounds) to: 

AK Distribution 
3 Balmoral Place 
Stirling 

Scotland FK8 2R 


Prison - Guinea Pigs 

It’s funny how you know it’s true, but you're 
still shocked to read the details. We've received a 
booklet called Medical Experiments on American 
Prisoners, detailing this sordid aspect of U.S. penal 
reality, (no price given.) Write: 

Air Water Earth 
PO Box 311712 
New Braunfels, Texas 
USA 78131 



Changing Men 

The magazine Changing Men has just released 
its 10th Anniversary Issue. Articles include: Issues 
for Men in the 1990s, Can White Heterosexual Men 
Understand Oppression?, The Men's Movement 
and the Survival of African-American Men in the 
90 's, plus lots more. $6/issue, $24/year from: 
Changing Men 
306 N. Brooks 
Madison, Wisconsin 
USA 53715 


Unusual Lore 

Flatland, a Catalogue of Unusual Lure, lists a 
wide variety of periodicals, books and pamphlets. 
"The last time I bought a book in a store I read the 
back cover, and it made it seem fascinating. When I 


got home, I read it.... boring." Everything at Flat- 
land is 100% guaranteed: if you don't like it, return 
it. Catalogue $2: 

Flatland 
PO Box 2420 
Fort Bragg, California 
USA 95437-2420 


Studies in Catalonia 

A Foundation for Libertarian and Anarcho- 
Syndicalist Studies is being established in Catalo- 
nia, to promote the study of anarcho-syndicalism 
and the libertarian movement through exhibitions, 
conferences and the accumulation of publications. It 
would like to organize an exchange of publications 
with any group interested. Contact: 

Fundo d'Estudis Libertaris 
Placa Due de Medinaceli, 

6 Entr. la. 

Barceona, Spain 08002 


War Resisters' Conference 

War Resisters' International will hold its 
Twentieth Triennial Conference near Brussels July 
28- August 1, and all sympathizers are invited. It 
will be a mixture of small meetings where everyone 
can participate, larger sessions, workshops and key 
forums on the Gulf Massacre and on implications of 
social change in Eastern Europe, Latin America and 
South Africa. There will be theme groups meeting 
daily on a variety of topics related to nonviolence, 
the arms trade, ecology, the New World Order, 
ecology, peace education and anti-sexism. Cost is 
95 pounds per person. Followed by business meet- 
ing August 2-3. For information and registration: 
War Resisters' International 
55 Dawes Street 
London SE17 1EL 
England 

Survival for Tribal Peoples 

Survival International is seeking to expand its 
membership, in order to increase the work it is do- 
ing on behalf of tribal peoples threatened with 
extinction. Successes to date include reduction of 
malaria from 90% to 10% among Yanomani tribes 
in Brazil (although genocide is still being practiced 
against them,) establishment of a reserve for the 


page 44 KICK IT OVER #26 


Waorani Indians of Ecuador's Amazonia, preserva- 
tion of the Central Kalahari Reserve for Kalahari 
Bushpeople and production of a report on the 
Sarawak situation in the tribal language. Survival 
helps fund Amazon Indian organizations and the 
occasional smallscale self-help project, such as one 
in the Philippines where displaced tropical forest 
Aroman Manobo people are finding their self-suffi- 
ciency again through small buffalo herds. But in 
Brazil one Indian tribe has been wiped out every 
year this century. To join or send donations, write: 
Survival International 
310 Edgware Road 
London W2 1DY 
United Kingdom 


Clothes for First Nations 

Readers who tend to discard clothing in good- 
to-eexcellent condition might instead consider fol- 
lowing the example of two Toronto wimmin who, 
in keeping with the sharing traditions of their 
Ukrainian ancestry, began collecting such clothes 
from their acquaintances for shipment to various 
first nations reservations in the Toronto vicinity. 
They ship clothing for men, wimmin and children, 
and are particularly interested in donations of 
clothing for large wimmin, who often have trouble 
finding good secondhand clothes. When the dona- 
tions they received came to exceed the needs of the 
first native groups, they began taking clothes to 
various wimmin's counselling centres, many of 
whose clients require such clothing for court ap- 
pearances. Clothes that are too lightweight to be of 
use on Canadian reservations are given to the 
Guyana Aid Foundation. 

If you live in the Toronto area and would like 
to donate clothes, or if you live elsewhere and 
would like their advice on how to start a similar 
project in your area, please call Alys 947-0808 or 
Lilian 759-9124 (area code 416.) No collect calls, 
please. 


Wimmin's Self Care 

Sojourner, a feminist magazine, includes in its 
March 1991 issue the Second Annual Wimmin's 
Health Supplement "Caring for Our Selves," featur- 
ing articles about lay midwives, menopause, femi- 
nist health centres and much more, in addition to its 
usual fine range of articles. $2/issue, $ 17.50/year 
from: 


Sojourner 
42 Seaverns Ave. 



SUMMER 1991 page 45 


Letters To The Editor 


Editors' note: One of KIO's aims is to compare 
various approaches to saving our environment - social 
ecology , deep ecology , bioregionalism etc. We welcome 
submissions on any of these positions. Although writers 
are welcome to address any point made by a previous 
writer that they wish to dispute , we ask that in future 
they refrain from interpersonal attacks and invective. We 
will likely edit such attacks from future submissions we 
print. We have not done so in this letter , as it is in the 
spirit of an ongoing controversy going back several is- 
sues, before this stipulation was made. 

"Anarchist" Label Abused 

As a matter of record, I would like to clarify cer- 
tain views that were imputed by Bill McCormick in the 
last issue of Kick It Over. Am I an admirer of Karl 
Marx and of certain writers of the Frankfurt school, as 
McCormick alarmingly claims? The ghastly truth can be 
stated quite bluntly: yes, I am. I am also an admirer of — 
and have worked with the ideas of — Heraclitus, Aris- 
totle, Diderot, Rousseau, Hegel, Proudhon, Bakunin, 
Kropotkin and Theodore Adorno ~ all in varying de- 
grees and with many critical reservations. And I also 
happen to be the author of Listen, Marxist /, Marxism as 
Bourgeois Sociology , and On Neo-Marxism, Bureau- 
cracy, and the Body Politic, not to speak of scores of 
pages over several books advancing an in-depth libertar- 
ian critique of Marx and Marxism, as McCormick fully 
knows — and demagogically ignores. 

If a 1982 quotation by my good friend John Clark 
that imputes a Marxist thrust to my writings is conclu- 
sive proof of my failure to tote a hidden anarchist line to 
which McCormick is privy, the more mystical and reli- 
gious readers of Kick It Over may be consoled to know 
that a few years later, Clark imputed a strong Taoist 
thrust to my writings. Frankly, I am neither a Marxist or 
a Taoist, but a social ecologist. My point? To find out 
what I think, it would be wise to read what I write about 
my ideas — and to read quotations from my works in 
their proper context — not to rely on what other people 
say my ideas are, especially when these others are quoted 
by basically dishonest "critics” like McCormick. 

If any doubts exist that McCormick's letter con- 
tains wanton distortions of my ideas (this is a consistent 
failure of all his letters against me), his treatment of my 
views on open strip mining should dispel them. In my 
last response to his Kick It Over (#23) criticism, I fell 
back on strip mining only as a last recourse for human- 
istic reasons because of the horrors of subsurface min- 
ing. I argued that most of the metals we use should be 
obtained "by salvaging the wastes of our vile society," 


not by compelling people to enter pits of the earth in or- 
der to mine ores. Rather than see people endure the hor- 
rors of subsurface mining, I argued, "I would gladly 
open a surface mine with a 'great shovel' — if an eco- 
logical society truly needed new ores and fuels — rather 
than send human beings into the depths of the earth 
where they know neither day nor night, clean air nor 
skies, a peaceful nature or a cool breeze to provide the 
steel for 'eco' -bicycles or the coke with which to smelt 
them. " 

In McCormick's hands, this concern for human 
beings is turned into a "defense of open strip mining," as 
though I condone what the mining corporations are do- 
ing to the land. Never in my interchange with Mc- 
Cormick have I read a line by him that shows the least 
interest in exploited peoples and the victims of social 
oppression. Instead, McCormick repeatedly recycles the 
same distortions in his letters, apparently with the view 
that no one will recall what either he or I said in our 
previous interchanges. Thus, a situation has been created 
in which McCormick never places a quotation from me 
in its context, but shrewdly tailors selected phrases, 
sentences and paragraphs from my writings and even 
from writings of my critics and friends, in an attempt to 
present my views in a form that is grossly distorted at 
best and maliciously false at worst. 

But there is more than distortion at work here. 
Kick It Over readers should know that McCormick has 
had the sheer gall to send me an unsolicited letter last 
September in which ~ half-threatening, half-cajoling ~ 
he proposed to me an utterly unprincipled 'deal'. 
"Regarding my 'trailing' you across several periodicals, 
yes," wrote McCormick, in acknowledgement that he 
was doing so in the opening lines of his first paragraph. 
The paragraph concluded with the proposal: "As soon as 
you stop the deliberate distortions [of deep ecology], I 
guarantee [!] you there will be a corresponding and nec- 
essary adjustment [!] in my own activities." In other 
words, if I stop criticizing deep ecology, McCormick 
will stop criticizing me — presumably, irrespective of my 
alleged "Marxism," "anthropocentricity," "technological 
mentality," etc. ad nauseam. 

Regardless of whether I am "distorting" deep ecol- 
ogy — and I strongly believe that I am not — I do not 
make deals of any kind on matters of principle or on 
ideas. McCormick, in my view, has turned what should 
be a serious dialogue about the insidious nature of deep 
ecology - with its religiosity, antihumanism, Malthusian 
orientation and social quietism - into a calculated, cyni- 
cal and systematic project of harassment, which renders 
any future response to him demeaning. 


Speaking more generally: I feel that sizable and 
perhaps growing number of New Age types in North 
America are now attaching the label "anarchist" to their 
medley of mystical, religious, misanthropic, anti-intel- 
lectual, and nihilistic grudges against anything that re- 
motely resembles a coherent, humanistic (and I don't 
mean "anthropocentric") body of ideas and a meaningful 
practice directed towards social change. (I do not direct 
these remarks at Charlene Spretnak, who makes no pre- 
tense of being a radical of any kind and simply recycles 
the same outrageous claim in latter after letter that any- 
one who has the nerve to disagree with her is "dividing' 
the Green movement.) I do not hesitate to emphasize that 
I have absolutely nothing in common with people of this 
kind. Whatever else I may feel about Marxist and liber- 
tarian thinkers of the past, I consistently adhere to the 
maxim, "Neither God [nor Goddess] nor Master! " 

Among the more serious problems we face today is 
not only the fact that capitalism has physically polluted 
the planet. In our era of disempowerment and ideological 
confusion, capitalism has created a largely mystical and 
religious form of mental pollution that threatens to in- 
volve people in a pseudo-spiritual inwardness and qui- 
etism that is more self-indulgent than social. When a 
theory of "rights' is extended to include rocks, and when 
people are asked to "think like a mountain' instead of 
thinking like human beings (to use the jargon of the deep 
ecology movement), the very notion of "rights" becomes 
so all-embracing and cosmic as to be meaningless, and 
thought is divested of any rationality and powers of in- 
sight. I am weary of seeing the high ideals of anarchism 
dragged through the mud or degraded to cheap bumper- 
sticker slogans. 

As I approach seventy, I have encountered all too 
many "anarchists" of two decades ago who have dis- 
carded their spray cans and crash helmets, entered pro- 
fessional schools, opened "ecologically responsible" 
capitalist enterprises that could easily earn dubious 
awards from the Utne Reader, or turned into outright 
real estate sharks and Marxist professors. Their New 
Age replicas in the 1990's are welcome to beat their 
conga drums to Paleolithic deities, divines the mysteries 
of "thinking like a mountain," fight for the "rights" of 
rocks and try to save the planet with neurotic trances. If 
readers of Kick It Over are interested in a thoughtful 
attempt to restore the honor of anarchism and recognize 
that ecological problems have their primary roots in so- 
cial problems, I would ask them to communicate with 
the Green Program Project, PO Box 111, Burlington, 
Vermont 05402, USA. And if they want to do something 
about changing this foul society with more than rituals 
and incantations, I would urge them to communicate 
with the Left Green Network (I'll forward their names), 


the only serious left libertarian movement of which I 
know in North America. 

Murray Bookchin 
Burlington, Vermont 

Newfoundland Problems 

The major threat to the extinction of New- 
foundlanders as a distinct society in Canada is New- 
foundland Municipal Affairs Minister Eric Gullage's 
concept of super cities. This theory dictates that small 
outpost towns be united to form larger ones. Rural mu- 
nicipalities within a radius of 100 miles from St.Johns or 
other large towns would be interwoven to eventually de- 
vise enormous futuristic cities. Town councils and citi- 
zens in Newfoundland feel that it's a destructive vision 
that could be dangerous to the system, resulting in 
higher taxes and added economic threats to the province. 

The real threat, of course, is the annihilation of an 
entire early European culture that has existed for over 
500 years. It's evident everywhere-modem highrises, 
fewer fishing boats, urban sprawl— as progress produces 
prosperity and Newfoundland politicians, embarrassed 
about their Newfie-goofy lifestyles and larger UIC and 
welfare lines, believe that provincial creation of super 
cities would conceal local poverty by creating super 
ghettos. This was done in St. Johns in the 70s, when 
mayors Murphy and Wyatt expropriated large areas of 
the city's ghetto for commercial use. The fisheries and 
fishermen which everybody associates with picturesque 
Newfoundland and robust Newfoundlanders are slowly 
and manipulatively becoming extinct due to European 
overfishing and uncaring federal and provincial govern- 
ments. Both government and opposition condone social 
genocide, which they see as Progress or Americaniza- 
tion. 

But most awesome are the hidden players in this fi- 
asco, large oil companies and possibly the CIA. They 
slyly and stealthily mould and shape Newfoundland's 
future in ways that small town politicians and media 
can't even understand. There are also some shady and 
extremely wealthy Newfoundland characters who are 
manipulating and advocating U.S. ideas among New- 
foundlanders, using the media. Buying large parcels of 
land for the coming oil boom, well-off Newfoundlanders 
have nothing to lose except their country. The victims 
are the peasant class, who after twenty years of boom 
face a lifetime of poverty. 

Change is sweeping Newfoundland, and everybody 
and everything with it. Good or bad? Only time will tell. 

George Vokey 
Spaniards Bay, Nfld 


O Lord our Father, 


our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to 
battle - be Thou near them! 




S®V.N 


With theitH in spirit, vue also go- fjirth from the 

- J !:.'i _ „x U ’l + omlto 


sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the 
foe. help to tear tlidjr soldiers ftp bloody shreds 
with odr Sh^ls^el|\u4,to cove# jpeir smiling fields 

with th^Hfiili^ieir Pfttfpt 0ead; help us to 

.the shrieks of 
to. lay 

#&dbu ri^pg^of fire a 
their ui|ttffe«dirtg |/| 


waste 

help u3--ifci^nte^e'TOY»..Y'wp^p',^ s ,./ < 

widow|;j|ito^ th £fl? 

out ro#f|s|fwi|h:;itti^"^ litt|sjMMfrjen fol^^derj/ 


lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy 
their steps, Vvater their way #M'P#r tears, stain 
the white snow yvi^the llilp^.df 't^il^dhd^d. ; ; 


feet! 


We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the 
Source of Love, and seek His aid with humble and 
contrite hearts. 


AMEN. 


-from The War Prayer 
by Mark Twain